Top 1200 Constitutional Monarchy Quotes & Sayings - Page 3

Explore popular Constitutional Monarchy quotes.
Last updated on April 15, 2025.
It was by the sober sense of our citizens that we were safely and steadily conducted from monarchy to republicanism, and it is by the same agency alone we can be kept from falling back.
Over the years to come, one thing is for certain: if the monarchy wishes to stay relevant and in power, it will have to change more.
The monarchy needs publicity: they must be seen to be relevant. Unfortunately, they can't just lead quiet lives. — © Penny Junor
The monarchy needs publicity: they must be seen to be relevant. Unfortunately, they can't just lead quiet lives.
The monarchy is thousands of years old and has experienced many things like 'The Crown' in the past. They're always changing and evolving; that's the thing. They have to.
From a monarchy followed by suffering under Communism, Ethiopians must be given the opportunity to flourish under the greatest of systems - democracy.
Monarchy hardens into despotism. Aristocracy contracts into oligarchy. Democracy expands into the supremacy of numbers.
For every monarchy overthrown the sky becomes less brilliant, because it loses a star. A republic is ugliness set free.
The government of man should be the monarchy of reason: it is too often the democracy of passions or the anarchy of humors.
I think the monarchy today is.?.?. mildly interesting and largely harmless. I can't find I can get very heated about it. In the next couple of generations, it is bound to go.
Some people think the NDP may want to get rid of the monarchy but I can assure you that that's absolutely not the case. My Dad was a big time monarchist and so am I.
Wealth held by a class and used ambitiously becomes as despotic as an absolute monarchy, and has in its hands manners, customs, laws, institutions, and governments themselves.
Films about the English monarchy, they tend to have a lavishness, sumptuous imagery, it's all very posh and rich.
The Magna Carta was the first class-based charter, enforced on the monarchy by the rising class. — © Guy Standing
The Magna Carta was the first class-based charter, enforced on the monarchy by the rising class.
I quite like the Queen. Now, this must come as a fairly amazing statement for someone who is avowedly left wing, pro-independence and anti-monarchy, but there you go.
Something as curious as the monarchy won't survive unless you take account of people's attitudes. After all, if people don't want it, they won't have it.
You are apprehensive of monarchy; I, of aristocracy. I would therefore have given more power to the President and less to the Senate.
A monarchy conducted with infinite wisdom and infinite benevolence is the most perfect of all possible governments.
I think it's obscene. I don't know how you support the monarchy. How can you do that?
In bad or corrupted natures the body will often appear to rule over the soul, because they are in an evil and unnatural condition. At all events we may firstly observe in living creatures both a despotical and a constitutional rule; for the soul rules the body with a despotical rule, whereas the intellect rules the appetites with a constitutional and royal rule. And it is clear that the rule of the soul over the body, and of the mind and the rational element over the passionate, is natural and expedient; whereas the equality of the two or the rule of the inferior is always hurtful.
My concern is less the monarchy as such than the attempt of a fading colonial power to hang onto grandeur.
From creating a new sovereign to affairs of the heart, majestic moments to everyday life, when monarchy wants to send a message it uses a photograph.
The worst that can happen under monarchy is rule by a single imbecile, but democracy often means the rule by an assembly of three or four hundred imbeciles.
The media is fully fine and hunky-dory with the idea that they may destroy somebody, and they think that's part of the job description. But you turn around and criticize them, and that's not permitted in the vacuum in which they live. They have free rein over you, because I guess this is how they define their constitutional responsibility. And since they have constitutional recognition, somehow they've all been taught at journalism school that nobody may assail them, that nobody may criticize them.
How could you say the best form of government is a republic if you think the universe is a monarchy?
Communism is not a political party nor a political plan under the Constitution; it is a system of government that is the opposite of our Constitutional government, and it would be necessary to destroy our government before Communism could be set up in the United States....[Communism] even reaches its hand into the sanctity of the family circle itself, disrupting the normal relationship of parent and child, all in a manner unknown and unsanctioned under the Constitutional guarantees under which we in America live.
I'm in favour of more democracy - let the British public decide what the future of the monarchy is and what shape it should be.
I don't think a monarchy led by 75- and 80-year-old men [Saudi Arabia] in today's modern world is really sustainable.
Once you touch the trappings of monarchy, like opening an Egyptian tomb, the inside is liable to crumble.
I've spent a bit of time with the Prince of Wales, who I respect greatly. I'd give two cheers for the Monarchy.
I cannot help concurring with the opinion that an absolute democracy, no more than absolute monarchy, is to be reckoned among the legitimate forms of government.
Our federal government, which was intended to operate as a very limited constitutional republic, has instead become a virtually socialist leviathan that redistributes trillions of dollars. We can hardly be surprised when countless special interests fight for the money. The only true solution to the campaign money problem is a return to a proper constitutional government that does not control the economy. Big government and big campaign money go hand-in-hand.
Of the various forms of government which have prevailed in the world, an hereditary monarchy seems to present the fairest scope for ridicule.
Britain has a great sense of its own national pride. It's like the monarchy is the embodiment of that pride.
The mystic reverence, the religious allegiance, which are essential to a true monarchy, are imaginative sentiments that no legislature can manufacture in any people.
The partial exception to our London-centric state institutions is the monarchy, which has always had peripatetic tendencies.
Radicalism is as British as tea and cakes, as much a part of our make-up as monarchy and football. It will never have its own jubilees, palaces or honours system.
Peoples nurtured on freedom and self-government judge any other form of polity to be deformed and unnatural. Those who are used to monarchy do the same .
Men write many fine and plausible arguments in support of monarchy, but the fact remains that where every man has a voice, brutal laws are impossible — © Mark Twain
Men write many fine and plausible arguments in support of monarchy, but the fact remains that where every man has a voice, brutal laws are impossible
Well, when did this become a monarchy? You know, we are the people. The president works for us and, you know, we need to remember that.
An absolute monarchy is one in which the sovereign does as he pleases so long as he pleases the assassins.
I was born on July 23rd, 1906, in Sarajevo in the province of Bosnia, which then belonged to the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy and later, in 1918, became part of Yugoslavia.
Who can in reason then or right assume monarchy over such as live by right his equals, if in power or splendor less, in freedom equal?
The idea that each corporation can be a feudal monarchy and yet behave in its corporate action like a democratic citizen concerned for the world we live in is one of the great absurdities of our time—
Oligopoly is an imperfect monopoly. Like the despotism of the Dual Monarchy, it is saved only by its incompetence.
If you look at Shakespeare's history plays, what the setting of monarchy allows is this extraordinary intensification of emotions and predicament.
I think if the monarchy were removed tomorrow, it wouldn't have a huge effect on the national mind-set.
What is called a republic, is not any particular form of government ... it is naturally opposed to the word monarchy, which means arbitrary power.
I think you can't have the monarchy without the coronation. I think you would have to get rid of the whole kit and caboodle. — © Claire Foy
I think you can't have the monarchy without the coronation. I think you would have to get rid of the whole kit and caboodle.
The revolution has overthrown the monarchy, true! But perhaps this means that the revolution simply has driven the skin disease inside the organism.
Extreme distress, which unites the virtue of a free people, imbitters the factions of a declining monarchy.
I'm not a republican any more. Not so voraciously anyway - I'm not in favour of the concept of monarchy, but I do see the good in it if there's a good person in the role.
The monarchy is finished. It was finished a while ago, but they're still making the corpses dance.
The stability and peace which seemed to be so firmly established by the brilliant monarchy of Francis I vanished with the terrible outbreak of the Wars of Religion.
The role of photography in crisis and recovery is fascinating, a dance between providing access and destroying the magic and mystique of the monarchy.
Saudi Arabia is a frightened monarchy. It's beset by Sunni extremists from the Islamic State and Shiite extremists backed by Iran.
The Monarchy...is the secret well from which the flourishing institution of British Snobbery draws its nourishment
The state is nothing but an instrument of opression of one class by another - no less so in a democratic republic than in a monarchy.
The rule of law is a republic. The rule of one person is a monarchy.
When it comes to the British monarchy, I prefer to be seduced by an image than presented with a real person. It's kind of a Warhol thing.
Then this will only prove again and again, that Monarchy in Germany is he longer capable of a national act.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!