Top 1200 Fighting Terrorism Quotes & Sayings - Page 20

The evil of predatory global capitalism and empire has spawned the evil of terrorism

If it is terrorism, if it is war on terror, then the Afghan people will join you on terror.

Much of the international unease with the Sochi Games has focused on the threat of terrorism, Putin's domestic repressiveness, and the Russian campaign of anti-gay propaganda.

Men who use terrorism as a means to power, rule by terror once they are in power.

'V-Wars' is a head-on collision of real-world science, terrorism, special forces action, ethics, politics and an exploration of what defines us as human.

Success in confronting terrorism on the regional or international levels is contingent upon addressing its root causes and protecting the right of peoples under foreign occupation to resistance

The battle against terrorism is not only a military fight but primarily a battle of information.

In our effort to tackle terrorism, we should look into all possible avenues of cyber-crime, its linkages with the terrorist world, and how these could be dealt with.

There is no definition of terrorism and there is still the reality that one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter.

Saying We will destroy terrorism is about as meaningful as saying: We shall annihilate mockery.

If we continue to create a world where there is poverty and disrespect, there will continue to be terrorism.

After 9/11, the businesses in my district and throughout the New York metropolitan area saw firsthand the result of a lack of availability of terrorism insurance.

I've always maintained terrorism passes through Pakistan, it doesn't evolve in Pakistan.

The best way to fight terrorism is not through guns. It's through pens, books, teachers and schools.

The best defense against terrorism is a strong offensive against terrorists. That work continues.

What we will not wait for is that particular nexus of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction that is extremism, and the technology to come together in a way that is harmful to the United States.

You cannot win a War on Terrorism. It's like having a war on jealousy.

The fight, this war, this fight against the remnants of terrorism will go on for some time.

We're working with our neighbors Indonesia and Malaysia to fight terrorism in our own common seas.

We often speak of domestic terrorism and hate crimes in the same breath, and there is a fine line between the two, and certainly overlap in some cases.

I say if you fight terrorism, it's based in fear, but if you promote peace, it's based on hope.

There are many terrorist states in the world, but the United States is unusual in that it is officially committed to international terrorism.

We protect the American people from a staggering range of threats. But make no mistake, securing the homeland against terrorism remains our top priority.

The war being fought in Afghanistan and Iraq is bringing about a fundamental change to the environment that has given rise and power to the extremists who export terrorism.

Whenever counterterrorism professionals see punditry and media make grand pronunciations on terrorism that defy all demonstrable evidence, an unrepeatable oath is usually muttered.

If Islam opposes terrorism, then Saudi Arabia should announce that no one supportive of ISIS or Al Qaeda is welcome in Mecca to make Hajj.

The truth is, terrorism flourishes in places of injustice rather than in places of poverty.

I have been defending Israel's right to exist, and to defend itself against terrorism, for many years-on college campuses, in television appearances and in debate.

If you are talking about terrorism, you need to sit down and understand what is making these people put dynamite around their waists and blow themselves up.

We need to strengthen our analytic capacity in Washington, we need to centralize the anti-terrorism effort.

We will not be intimidated or pushed off the world stage by people who do not like what we stand for, and that is, freedom, democracy and the fight against disease, poverty and terrorism.

We must fight terrorism as if there's no peace process and work to achieve peace as if there's no terror.

The key to tackling Islamist fundamentalism and terrorism from the Islamist community is in the hands of moderate Muslims.

We have a president [Barack Obama] that won't use the term radical Islamic terrorism, won't use it.

Terrorism can go anywhere where there is not strong government, or government that cannot control its hinterlands.

We [Libyans] support the Palestinian resistance, and all the world supports this. We support their just cause, but we are against terrorism.

The fight against terrorism is also a fight for the rights and dignity of women.

We are in a war on terrorism. We need to conduct that war and take it to the terrorists, not here at home.

Barack Obama says that we need to be humble toward terrorism. Yet he is the one we have been waiting for. That is humble?

Terrorism is in many, many ways the final utterance of voices unheard.

The nexus between terrorism and nuclear weapons, or even nuclear material, is obviously a current concern.

We need to strengthen our analytic capacity in Washington, we need to centralize the anti-terrorism effort

ISIS and radical Islamic terrorism will face no more determined foe than I will be.

Saudi Arabia is a crucial ally in the Middle East, supporting U.S. efforts to fight terrorism and halt the ambitions of a hostile and increasingly aggressive Iran.

Unless and until something concrete is done about addressing the Israeli-Palestinian issue you won't get a real start on the war against terrorism.

I intend to vote for President George W. Bush in the next election, because in my view, he is best able to wage the war against international terrorism.

We do not sponsor any form of terrorism anywhere in the world. Never have, never will

The fight against terrorism is an international struggle of the free world against the forces of darkness.

The global response to global terrorism must not endanger fundamental human rights and freedoms.

Think of the war against terrorism. In my view, Washington's approach can be compared to a doctor constantly banging away at a tumor instead of removing it surgically.

In the '70s, terrorism was much more serious, in that many more people got killed.

Our values and way of life will prevail - terrorism will not.

The political solutions proposed against encryption are not going to work against terrorism.

I would say, we have had a lot of problems with radical Islamic terrorism, that's what I'd say.

If we are tough on crime and on terrorism, as Labour is, then I think Britain will be safer under Labour.

With the exception of weapons of mass destruction, there is no other type of attack that is more effective than suicide terrorism. The perception is that it's impossible to guard against.

In the 55-60 years of their rule, the successive Congress government have only looted the country and plunged it into poverty, casteism, regionalism, terrorism, and naxalism.

The standard is the same. Don't get me wrong, the main difference is the number of sparring partners. Greg Jackson and Mike Winkeljohn are the best coaches in the world in my opinion and in many other people's opinion but it really it comes down to the number of sparring partners. I go to my gym and I have 10 fighters fighting on the local level but when you go over there it's like 30 fighters all fighting in the UFC or other bigger shows. That's really the main thing; the numbers.

Clearly, the response to terrorism and violent extremism must respect human rights and comply with international law. That is not just a question of justice but of effectiveness.

Whether you call it terrorism or resistance, and whether you like Hamas or not, it is a political entity that no one can ignore.