Top 1200 Judicial Review Quotes & Sayings - Page 3

There's no one who has sued the Trump administration on transparency issues more than Judicial Watch.

You have a good judicial system in the U.S., as you have learned from the Nixon-Watergate period.

I never expected to be in the papers. I personally never expected to be in the papers. The height of my ambition for these books was, well frankly, to get reviewed. A lot of children's books don't even get reviewed.. forget good review, bad review. Personally, no, I never expected to be in the papers so it's an odd experience when it happens to you .

He has absolutely no judicial supervision of all of this [ invasions of privacy ]. So all in all, [Barack] Obama is a disaster.

Some of the most impressive judicial nominees are grossly mistreated.

We all have trust in the judicial systems.

The purity of the critical ermine, like that of the judicial, is often soiled by contact with politics.

The indispensible judicial requisite is intellectual humility.

The idea that there aren't mistakes made constantly in the judicial system is too obvious even to need to mention.

Over the years, Judicial Watch has called out many White House conflicts of interest.

Conservative voters increasingly understand that the one legacy a president can leave is his judicial appointments.

Ownership is a very complex judicial concept.

South Korea is a vigorous democracy, with strong judicial institutions and a commitment to the rule of law.

Judicial excellence requires candor before confirmation. We are being asked to give the nominee enormous power.

That's the whole point of... of prosecutorial discretion in the judicial system. It's finding a just outcome in an individual case.

A writer writes a book. People read it. You don't know what they're reading, really. You read a review and think, "That is so inaccurate. You can't have been reading my book with any kind of attention, because that is all wrong, that's even the wrong name you're including there." But these reviewers have been diminished in importance, the work is so little respected. If you're reviewed by a real critic, by James Wood or Louis Menand, then you get something that is informed, interesting, and highly articulate. But the average review doesn't have that kind of depth anymore.

There is a danger to judicial independence when people have no understanding of how the judiciary fits into the constitutional scheme.

An important Italian critic once gave Fistful of Dollars a very bad review when it came out. Then he went to the university here [Rome] with Once Upon a Time in America. We showed it to 10,000 students. And while the man was speaking that day to the students, with me present, he said, "I have to state one thing. When I gave that review about Sergio's films, I should have taken into account that on Sergio Leone's passport, there should not be written whether the nationality is Italian or anything else. What should be written is: 'Nationality: Cinema.' "

Historically, figuring out what to do to the tax code has been almost as contentious a political issue as judicial appointments.

Empathy is a virtue, but it should not be a guiding judicial principle.

JAG is an acronym for the Judge Advocate General, which is the judicial system of the military.

Morality cannot be legislated, but behavior can be regulated. Judicial decrees may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless.

Trees have judicial standing, and probably grass too.

My judicial philosophy is fidelity to the law.

It is true that there have been excesses of judicial activism.

There's no such thing as judicial supremacy.

Our Parliamentary system has simply failed to meet the challenge of judicial activism.

I believe [filibustering judicial nominees] is in violation of the Constitution

To be effective, judicial administration must not be leaden-footed.

Without any direction from Congress, our judicial branch has unilaterally created and defined qualified immunity.

The first review our band ever got - when I was 17 years old and we had just released our first EP, and this tiny little magazine wrote a review on it, and for that month, we were the best album of the month, and we were also the worst album of the month. We won best and worst album of the month in the same magazine.

I personally believe technology can transform the functioning of the judicial system.

So the danger of conservative judicial activism has been averted for another year. Stay tuned.

Out of control judicial activism threatens traditional marriage in America.

Of course, conservatives always claim to be against judicial activism.

Conservatives who care about nominations of judges who practice judicial restraint are, constitutionally, restrained people themselves.

Liberals attempt through judicial activism what they cannot win at the ballot box.

You can be sure that Judicial Watch is investigating and monitoring the responses of our government to the coronavirus threat.

The judicial system is the most expensive machine ever invented for finding out what happened and what to do about it.

My Catholic faith is the foundation of my worldview, and my judicial duty is governed, from beginning to end, by the law.

We must apply a judicial rather than a political standard to the information before us [if choosing a Judge].

The FCC is a quasi-judicial body. It is supposed to undertake this period of public comment with a degree of seriousness and respect.

When it comes to judicial nominations, President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats are fond of reminding Republicans that elections have consequences.

It just seemed fitting to have our own lounge with our own dance review that paid homage to where The Pussycat Dolls originated, ... So it wasn't just another nightclub. It was somewhere where people can go and see an old school show with real dancing and real performing and real singing. It's perfect for Vegas. It's got that whole cabaret, burlesque-inspired review of dancing, and the whole fishnets, and boas.

We have a problem with judicial activism in this country.

Healing... is an active and internal process that includes investigating one's attitudes, memories and beliefs with the desire to release all negative patterns that prevent one's full emotional and spiritual recovery. This internal review inevitably leads one to review one's external circumstances in an effort to recreate one's life in a way that serves activation of will - the will to see and accept truths about one's life and how one has used one's energies; and the will to begin to use energy for the creation of love, self-esteem, and health.

Conservative Justices have a history of not standing by their professed commitment to judicial restraint.

Only legislative, judicial, and executive action can completely guarantee the victory of the free world.

An important and fundamental premise of the American judicial system is the presumption of innocence, that is until proven guilty.

I have 100 percent confidence in the German judicial system.

The judicial system is really taking an activist role in preventing Trump from implementing his agenda.

When a court goes too far, it actually weakens our respect for judicial institutions.

Judicial abuse occurs when judges substitute their own political views for the law.

When it comes to revamping our bail laws, we can't rely on judicial discretion alone.

It's my policy not to review funerals.

I have faith in the judicial system.

No one will escape justice. It's a moral and judicial duty.

Writers are funny about reviews: when they get a good one they ignore it-- but when they get a bad review they never forget it. Every writer I know is the same way: you get a hundred good reviews, and one bad, andyou remember only the bad. For years, you go on and fantasize about the reviewer who didn't like your book; you imagine him as a jerk, a wife-beater, a real ogre. And, in the meantime, the reviewer has forgotten all about the whole thing. But, twenty years later, the writer still remembers that one bad review.

It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.

There is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later turn into a judicial one.