Top 1200 Judicial Review Quotes & Sayings - Page 4

It's much easier to say negative things in a review.

Individuals because of their identity can't render an impartial judgment is just deeply offensive and contrary to all the ideals of the judicial system that we value.

The standard of good behavior for the continuance in office of the judicial magistracy is certainly one of the most valuable of the modern improvements in the practice of government.

If some part of the review is true, those are the ones that sting.

Historically, the judicial branch has often been the sole protector of the rights of minority groups against the will of the popular majority.

To review ones store is to mow twice.

If you get a bad review, you take that in your stride.

To me, it's weird when people review improv at all.

A good review from the critics is just another stay of execution.

I'd never seen anyone do a rebuttal review to some of the reviews.

[Louis] Brandeis is often painted as an acolyte of judicial restraint, or the view that judges should uphold laws whether or not they like them.

Nothing has yet been offered to invalidate the doctrine that the meaning of the Constitution may as well be ascertained by the Legislative as by the Judicial authority.

The acme of judicial distinction means the ability to look a lawyer straight in the eyes for two hours and not hear a damned word he says.

Throw in neglect and politicization of the judicial system and you see the result: soaring rates of cocaine trafficking through Venezuela and worsening corruption of institutions.

Honestly, at the end of every season, we sit down and review where we're at.

Judge [Samuel] Alito, I'll tell you the same thing I told John Roberts. I expect you to adhere to the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Legislative enactments proceed from men carrying their views a long time back; while judicial decisions are made off hand.

I haven't read a review of one of my films for the best part of 10 years.

If we are giving judicial benefits to one part, we should give them to the other part as well.

The first session of the Congress of the United States under the Constitution was devoted principally to the problems of immediate revenues and administrative and judicial organization.

I rarely read or buy a book because of a review.

it's a good idea to review past mistakes before committing new ones.

Judicial Watch has a massive project to force states and counties across the nation to clean up their voter rolls.

The judicial branch has, in its finest hours, stood firmly on the side of individuals against those who would trample their rights.

Invalidating laws has absolutely nothing to do with judicial activism. It depends on whether the law is unconstitutional or not. That's really the key point.

To read is human, to review is divine.

A good, sympathetic review is always a wonderful surprise.

The position the Government finds itself in is not one of constructing a law, but of carrying out a decision given by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

I had the longest judicial vacancy in the history of the United States - on the Eastern District of North Carolina. Not many people know that.

I'll refrain from making any more comments on any ongoing people involved in the judicial process.

No judicial system could do society's work if each issue had to be decided afresh in every case which raised it.

The Founding Fathers built our judicial system to withstand the special interest pressures that beset the political branches of government.

The public disclosure of assets by judges, though a welcome first step, is certainly not the end all of the serious problem of judicial accountability or the lack of it.

Always focus on the front windshield and not the review mirror.

Unless there is a strong movement of citizens, who are the consumers of justice, we are hardly likely to see any serious judicial reforms in this country.

Due process and judicial process are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security.

Government research has to go through peer review.

Now that judges embrace forcibly starving someone to death, Congress should use its appropriation power to starve the judicial budget.

All our words and acts are passing in review before God.

Central planning, judicial activism, and the nanny state all presume vastly more knowledge than any elite have ever possessed.

If there is a nuclear tactic being used here, I submit it is the use of that obstruction where a willful minority blocks a bipartisan majority from voting on the President's judicial nominees.

Behind this judicial wall of separation there is a tyranny of lies that will fall... I say to you, my friends, let it fall!

Judicial activism must be lessened, and the judiciary should do its work and let politicians work.

A well-functioning judicial or education system is just as much part of the wealth of a nation as its roads, ports and factories.

One is entitled to say without qualification that the correlation between prior judicial experience and fitness for the Supreme Court is zero.

A judicial activist is a judge who interprets the Constitution to mean what it would have said if he, instead of the Founding Fathers, had written it.

I never read a book I must review; it prejudices you so.

One cannot review a bad book without showing off.

Since the day the Obama administration first launched its duplicitous Benghazi cover story, Judicial Watch has been pressing for the full truth.

The executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them, to the end that it may be a government of laws and not of men.

I have been informed repeatedly that in lieu of records, I would be expected to testify about my service in the White House to demonstrate my experience and judicial philosophy.

In the absolute majority of western democracies - elected officials are the ones who appoint the highest bench in the judicial system. There is no reason for us to lag behind.

I published my first poem in 'The Paris Review' in 1980.

I try not to read reviews, but if it's a really important review or somebody sends it to me, I'll read it. It's really interesting when you read a review of yourself, you see this weird reflected image - it's like looking a funhouse mirror. Like, "It's sort of me, but is my neck really that elongated?" Sometimes it's vaguely embarrassing what people think of you. When I was in Italy doing this press-interview day, this guy asked me, "Are you a tortured soul?" It's embarrassing to have somebody think you're a tortured soul, or that you think of yourself as a tortured soul.

The Constitution is not a panacea for every blot upon the public welfare. Nor should this Court, ordained as a judicial body, be thought of as a general haven for reform movements.

Judicial Watch's FOIA lawsuits have already shown the Obama State Department was corruptly targeting President Trump.

If there are such things as political axioms, the propriety of the judicial power of a government being co-extensive with its legislative, may be ranked among the number.

We've seen filibusters to block judicial nominations, jobs bills, political transparency, ending Big Oil subsidies - you name it, there's been a filibuster.

Obama and Biden want a bench crammed full of liberal judicial activists, and it's up to the American people to tell them 'no.'

All our words and actions pass in review before God.