Top 1200 Nuclear Deterrence Quotes & Sayings - Page 16

Explore popular Nuclear Deterrence quotes.
Last updated on November 22, 2024.
Lawyers are like nuclear weapons. By all rights they shouldn't exist, but if some people have them, then you'd better have one, too, just in case.
If you're Iran's minister of defense, I think you'd try to develop at least one nuclear weapon to save yourself from what happened to Iraq.
The world should be very clear about making sure that Iran does not get nuclear weapons, period. — © Benjamin Netanyahu
The world should be very clear about making sure that Iran does not get nuclear weapons, period.
In seeking to counter challenges such as terrorist threats, hostile state activity, or nuclear proliferation, we cannot work in isolation.
But beyond all that, the question that is continually begged is why isn't America leading the way toward total abolition of nuclear weapons.
The consensus is that climate change ranks along with nuclear warfare as the top two risks facing human civilization.
There are two problems for our species' survival - nuclear war and environmental catastrophe - and we're hurtling towards them. Knowingly.
What could become a danger to world peace is Iran's nuclear program and the country's open threat to annihilate Israel.
Until the ayatollahs that run Iran give up the pursuit of nuclear weapons, we cannot and should not ease the pressure on the regime to do so.
The issues and challenges surrounding nuclear non-proliferation are continuously evolving. Theyve changed dramatically at several junctures in recent memory.
There are no oil rigs in the Durham region of Ontario and the only energy that our area is known for is the electricity generated from nuclear power.
The issues and challenges surrounding nuclear non-proliferation are continuously evolving. They've changed dramatically at several junctures in recent memory.
It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States. — © John F. Kennedy
It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States.
I'm passionately opposed to the nuclear family, with its mom and dad and their 2.4 children. I think it's the most neurotic life-style ever developed.
As we speak, Iran has rolled back its nuclear program, shipped out its uranium stockpile, and the world has avoided another war.
We keep discussing nuclear power and other issues, but we should spare a thought to the basic needs of our women.
I believe that dialogue is necessary. We were unable to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue through only the sanctions and pressure.
By far the single greatest danger facing humankind - in fact, all living beings on our planet - is the threat of nuclear destruction.
When George W. Bush came into office, North Korea had maybe one nuclear weapon and verifiably wasn't producing any more.
My greatest fear is the Iranians acquire a nuclear weapon and give it to a terrorist organization. And there is a real threat of them doing that.
A total nuclear freeze is counterproductive - especially now, when technology is rapidly changing and the Soviets have some important strategic advantages.
Decomposition, for most, starts when they leave the free, social, and uncorrupted college life for the solitary confinement of professions and nuclear families.
The thing that makes countries want to pursue some kind of nuclear deterrent is precisely the fact that they feel threatened.
Nuclear war would mean abolition of most comforts, and disruption of normal routines, for children and adults alike.
She [Hillary Clinton] wants to start an air war over Syria with Russia, a nuclear-armed power.
We have wide-ranging joint projects in the nuclear energy sphere, logistics, machine building and trade as a whole [with China].
We are a democracy: there are enough checks and balances in our country, and we have an impeccable record of not contributing in any way to nuclear proliferation.
It is not viable for one country to demand a right to increase and upgrade its nuclear weapons capabilities while asking others to eliminate theirs.
Nuclear power plants must be prepared to withstand everything from earthquakes to tsunamis, from fires to floods to acts of terrorism.
No one in the United States has become seriously ill or has died because of any kind of accident at a civilian nuclear power plant.
The only countries that have successfully moved from fossil fuels to low-carbon power have done so with the help of nuclear energy.
The question arises whether private companies can bear responsibility when considering the large risks involved with nuclear business.
On many issues, including on the use of nuclear weapons, it is not clear where [Donald] Trump stands, due to his contradictory statements.
The Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons would be infinitely more costly than any scenario you can imagine to stop it.
My brain knows best-before dates are a con; my panicky gut treats them like a nuclear countdown.
The Framework Agreement is one of the best things the [Clinton] Administration has done because it stopped a nuclear weapons program in North Korea.
The challenge that climate change presents to us, both in Australia and around the world, won't be solved by ramping up the nuclear industry.
To me, nuclear weapons are the secret crisis of our time. Frankly, everyone needs to reread John Hersey's 'Hiroshima.' — © Erik Larson
To me, nuclear weapons are the secret crisis of our time. Frankly, everyone needs to reread John Hersey's 'Hiroshima.'
One of the things that ultimately led me to leave mathematics and go into political science was thinking I could prevent nuclear war.
I've repeatedly voted for sanctions against Iran. And I think all options should be on the table to prevent them from having nuclear weapons.
We shall continue, in this era of negotiation, to work for the limitation of nuclear arms and to reduce the danger of confrontation between the great powers.
Now, as far as I know, nobody has ever put up the U.S.'s nuclear missiles on the Internet. I mean, it's not something I've heard about.
The nuclear family must be destroyed... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.
We must not allow the Iranian regime to use the nation's vast energy resource as a financial pipeline for its nuclear ambitions.
There's people out there with nuclear bombs and yet we've got all these politicians trying to make a political platform based on a record. Isn't it ridiculous?
You know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button.
The JCPOA has made the world safer. The deal ensures that Israel does not have to live with the threat of a nuclear Iran in its backyard.
Donald Trump's idea that more nations should get nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia, Japan, South Korea. — © Tim Kaine
Donald Trump's idea that more nations should get nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia, Japan, South Korea.
When the President of Iran talks about removing Israel from the face of the Earth and is building nuclear bombs with a range of 3000km, you have to be worried.
Inter Services Intelligence-aided sleeper modules within the country are more dangerous than a nuclear bomb.
As for total disarmament, there are almost 50,000 nuclear weapons in the world today; even if they were banned, not all would be destroyed.
Nuclear power can continue to help us reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, but we must do everything we can to make it safer.
Nuclear energy is a baseload - meaning it's power that you can run any time you want, day or night - and carbon-free.
The trick in nuclear strategy is to maintain stability by balancing potentials and thus to discourage events from converting the hypothetical to the actual.
My comedy is a nuclear bomb inside my mind. It's a weapon that's never been tested. It just blows up and flattens everybody.
We [The United States] should be prepared to launch a pre-emption strike against Iran to eliminate their nuclear capability.
The fundamental premise is that neither the United States or the international community is going to allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.
There are signs that the Arab states are beginning to realize that a nuclear-armed Iran would be a threat to the entire region, and not just to Israel.
I don't think that Iran with a nuclear capability will be just the problem of the state of Israel. This is a matter that concerns the whole world.
In the 1990s, the United States offered to help North Korea with its energy needs if it gave up its nuclear weapons programme.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!