Top 1200 Nuclear Deterrence Quotes & Sayings - Page 18
Explore popular Nuclear Deterrence quotes.
Last updated on November 22, 2024.
If there were Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, it makes it certain there would be a reprisal attack against the United States at some point.
They assert that their program is purely peaceful. . . . We want them to demonstrate clearly in the actions they propose that they have truly abandoned any nuclear weapons ambition.
If human beings are to survive in a nuclear age, committing acts of violence may eventually have to become as embarrassing as urinating or defecating in public are today.
Once Iraq becomes a nuclear power, the very decision to go to war against it would become a totally different ball game.
Iran with a nuclear weapon or with fissile material that can be given to Hezbollah or Hamas or others has the potential of not just destabilizing the Middle East. But it could be brought here.
The fact is that it's the most dangerous place to be on the political scale is to brand those on the other side as racist. That's the atomic bomb. That's the nuclear weapon of an American.
What better way to head off more oil drilling, nuclear plants, than by blowing up a rig? I'm just noting the timing, here.
By burning nuclear waste as fuel, we believe we can power the United States cleanly for hundreds of years without ever touching new resources.
I think that just as we're in the nuclear era we're also in an era of non-violence. It's undefeatable.
A bad deal with Iran on nuclear weapons is worse than no deal at all.
Today, nuclear power provides 20 percent of power in the United States.
Putin needs to understand and feel in his gut that if the Chechens get a nuclear bomb, they're going to Moscow first, they're not coming to New York.
It's very important to make nuclear deals but you have to make them from strength, not from weakness.
Let them bomb Japan with that nasty missile. Their missile cannot load a nuclear warhead.
What Korea and the U.S. both ultimately seek to achieve is the dismantlement of North Korea's nuclear program.
I'm a typical Delhi girl. Professional parents, nuclear family. My father was in the navy. I've spent my whole life in government accommodation, and it's been lovely.
Nuclear proliferation - the proliferation of WMDs altogether - is one of the greatest dangers of our time.
Before Chernobyl or without Chernobyl the nuclear power was the safe thing.
Try everything. Do everything. Nuclear. Biomass. Coal. Solar. You name it. I support them all.
The world's deteriorating ecology poses as great a danger to mankind today as did the nuclear standoff between the superpowers at the height of the Cold War.
The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind.
The larger picture here is that a North Korea with nuclear weapons adds to the larger proliferation risk.
In light of 50 years of bondage of Eastern Europe, [invading the Soviet Union in 1948 to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons] was probably a reasonable thing to do.
Iran's strong logic and firm diplomacy is the guideline for all government officials in negotiations on country's peaceful nuclear program with foreigners, quite resolutely.
A nuclear-weapons armed Iran is not in anyone's human-rights interests. That is a direct threat to the lives and the livelihoods and the stability not only of the region but beyond.
In its report, the Cox Committee concludes that China is using stolen U.S. design information to speed up its deployment of a new nuclear missile force.
India, being a sovereign state, has the right to decide what kind of nuclear deterrent New Delhi needs in respect of international security perception.
Today's concrete-pouring ceremony of Chashma-2 marks yet another landmark in Pak-China relations and a milestone in the history of nuclear technology in Pakistan.
Like a nuclear disaster, the fallout from the meltdown of Syria threatens to be with us for decades, and the longer it is permitted to continue, the more severe the damage will be.
The idea that the growing demand for energy worldwide can be met with energy from nuclear power is nonsense.
One of the most important reasons for North Korea continuing its nuclear ambitions is to consolidate the power to stay within the Kim Jong Il family.
I think we have to get bolder. Why after Fukushima didn't we all go out and shut down all the nuclear power plants and stay there until it happened?
If there was a market in mass-produced portable nuclear weapons, we'd market them, too.
We have a historic opportunity to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons in Iran, and to do so peacefully, with the international community firmly behind us. We should seize that chance.
It's very difficult to convince other countries that they shouldn't pursue nuclear weapons programs if we ourselves are actively developing a component of a strategic defense system.
I received a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering, then graduated with a masters in nuclear engineering.
Responsible statesmen have only one choice - to do everything possible to prevent a nuclear catastrophe. Any other position is short-sighted; more so, it is suicidal.
The Islamic State is dangerous, a nuclear-armed Islamic Republic is even more so.
India can live without nuclear weapons. That's our dream, and it should be the dream of the U.S. also.
I think, for me, nuclear is just the power, the devastation is very important to me.
Maybe the words are the same, but the time is not the same. Iranians weren't working on achieving nuclear energy.
The entire world will be in nuclear war, and only the Swiss will be going, 'what's that noise?'
The Iran nuclear issue is on top of the agenda. It is a very complicated issue with long history.
Nuclear is the largest source of clean, carbon-free power in rich nations, and the science shows it is the safest way to make reliable electricity.
Nuclear weapons will not be gotten rid of until the United States confronts the magnitude of the horror, the tragedy, and the long-term suffering of the victims
[Hillary Clinton] worked a tough negotiation with nations around the world to eliminate the Iranian nuclear weapons program without firing a shot.
As difficult as it is to eliminate the risk of nuclear warfare, it requires fewer changes to the global economy than does averting or reversing climate change.
Why I oppose the nuclear-arms race: I prefer the human race.
Nuclear energy, in terms of an overall safety record, is better than other energy.
First, by 2020, North America will be energy independent by taking full advantage of our oil and coal and gas and nuclear and renewables.
We are against any WMD, any weapons of mass destruction, whether chemical or nuclear.
I have more nuclear physicists living in my district than in any other district.
Only nuclear can lift all humans out of poverty while saving the natural environment. Nothing else - not coal, not solar, not geo-engineering - can do that.
The world's state sponsor of terrorism is now on path, sanctioned by the United States, to create nuclear weapons. We are going to make it possible for them.
Choose the human race over the nuclear race. Bury the weapons and don't burn the people.
We must refuse to submit to those institutions which are by definition sexist - marriage, the nuclear family, religions built on the myth of feminine evil.
The current situation of the earthquake, tsunami and the nuclear plants is in a way the most severe crisis in the 65 years since World War II.
Well, Israel, obviously, thinks of the Iranian nuclear program as an existential threat to Israel.
We believe US threats of an approaching World War III and their use of Iran's nuclear issue as an excuse is another form of American insanity.
The talk about balance, nuclear balance, seems to me to be metaphysical and doesn't seem to be real at all.
