Top 1200 Nuclear Fusion Quotes & Sayings - Page 18

The JCPOA has made the world safer. The deal ensures that Israel does not have to live with the threat of a nuclear Iran in its backyard.

The sadistic person is as dependent on the submissive person as the latter is on the former; neither can live without the other. The difference is only that the sadistic person commands, exploits, hurts, humiliates, and that the masochistic person is commanded, exploited, hurt, humiliated. This is a considerable difference in a realistic sense; in a deeper emotional sense, the difference is not so great as that which they both have in common: fusion without integrity .

I agree that we need a working relationship with Russia to deescalate a nuclear arms race, to resolve the crisis in Syria.

This is one of the worst deals ever made by any country in history. The deal with Iran will lead to nuclear problems.

The only thing that really scales up apart from nuclear is solar power from other people's deserts.

It has been the policy of the United States, Democrats and Republicans, to do everything we could to reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

We must not allow the Iranian regime to use the nation's vast energy resource as a financial pipeline for its nuclear ambitions.

The public should always be notified as soon as possible in the event of a leak or other emergency at a nuclear facility.

Alice Stewart [is] a much underestimated scientist who has been an indomitable challenger of the establishment and a thorn in the flesh of the nuclear industry.

Nuclear war would mean abolition of most comforts, and disruption of normal routines, for children and adults alike.

A total nuclear freeze is counterproductive - especially now, when technology is rapidly changing and the Soviets have some important strategic advantages.

The nuclear arsenal that Pakistan has, I believe is secure. I think the government and the military have taken adequate steps to protect that.

I never turn on the news over the weekend, short of a nuclear detonation somewhere. I just don't. I don't learn anything from it anymore.

But beyond all that, the question that is continually begged is why isn't America leading the way toward total abolition of nuclear weapons.

My greatest fear is the Iranians acquire a nuclear weapon and give it to a terrorist organization. And there is a real threat of them doing that.

So long as nuclear weapons continue to exist, so will the temptation to threaten others with overwhelming military force.

As long as I'm president of the United States Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. I made that clear when I came into office.

The Highway Code can't be that difficult to understand, and yet my brain seems to treat it as a set of nuclear fission instructions in Old Japanese.

Crabgrass can grow on bowling balls in airless rooms, and there is no known way to kill it that does not involve nuclear weapons.

Time is running out for Iran to address the international community's growing concerns about its nuclear program.

I would characterize current US nuclear weapons policy as immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous

Nuclear energy is a baseload - meaning it's power that you can run any time you want, day or night - and carbon-free.

For the sake of future generations, we must continue to work together to realise a world without nuclear weapons.

Donald Trump is a person who has been very cavalier, even casual about the use of nuclear weapons.

The United States government first learned of the diversion of the W-88 nuclear warhead design in late 1995.

Nuclear apocalypse - who do you need? Actors are probably not top of the list. What can I do for you? I can pretend to be somebody who can grow you some nice crops.

That's the trouble with cookbooks. Like sex education and nuclear physics, they are founded on an illusion. They bespeak order, but they end in tears.

There are nuclear-weapons-free zones in several parts of the world already, except that they're not implemented fully, because the U.S. won't allow it.

Those who insist on transferring the Iranian nuclear dossier to the UN Security Council have received an additional argument for doing so.

The fundamental premise is that neither the United States or the international community is going to allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.

Nixon did have a secret plan, and I knew that it involved making threats of nuclear war to North Vietnam.

A democracy survives when its citizens have access to trustworthy and impartial sources of information, when it can discern lies from truth. Take this away and a democracy dies. The fusion of news and entertainment, the rise of a class of celebrity journalists on television who define reporting by their access to the famous and the powerful, the retreat by many readers into the ideological ghettos of the Internet and the ruthless drive by corporations to destroy the traditional news business are leaving us deaf, dumb and blind.

If you're Iran's minister of defense, I think you'd try to develop at least one nuclear weapon to save yourself from what happened to Iraq.

We keep discussing nuclear power and other issues, but we should spare a thought to the basic needs of our women.

There's people out there with nuclear bombs and yet we've got all these politicians trying to make a political platform based on a record. Isn't it ridiculous?

The whitewashing of windows can provide very effective protection against fire resulting from the heat-flash from nuclear explosions.

Inter Services Intelligence-aided sleeper modules within the country are more dangerous than a nuclear bomb.

Washington's adventuristic policy, whipping up international tension to the utmost, is pushing mankind towards nuclear catastrophe.

We are a democracy: there are enough checks and balances in our country, and we have an impeccable record of not contributing in any way to nuclear proliferation.

There are two problems for our species' survival - nuclear war and environmental catastrophe - and we're hurtling towards them. Knowingly.

The right of an individual to refuse to kill, to torture, or to participate in the preparation for the nuclear destruction of humanity seems to me to be fundamental.

The nuclear arms race is like two people sitting in a pool of gasoline spending all their time making matches.

If we had adhered to the concept of connectedness, then we would not have created nuclear weapons, huge armies and global warming.

Designing new low-yield nuclear weapons for limited strikes dangerously lowers the threshold for their use.

President Obama has made it clear that the United States is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Real power in the modern world is determined by a nation's economic capabilities, not just the nuclear warheads it stores.

Nuclear power plants must be prepared to withstand everything from earthquakes to tsunamis, from fires to floods to acts of terrorism.

We have wide-ranging joint projects in the nuclear energy sphere, logistics, machine building and trade as a whole [with China].

She [Hillary Clinton] wants to start an air war over Syria with Russia, a nuclear-armed power.

Britain's independent possession of nuclear weapons has turned into a political touchstone for commitment to national defense, but this is an illusion.

The trick in nuclear strategy is to maintain stability by balancing potentials and thus to discourage events from converting the hypothetical to the actual.

[Saddam Hussein is aggressively seeking nuclear and biological weapons and ] the United States may well become the target.

The only countries that have successfully moved from fossil fuels to low-carbon power have done so with the help of nuclear energy.

Even in this nuclear thing, [ Donald Trump] says we should be stronger and expand. What does that mean? So, what is concrete in what he's saying?

Certain countries are dumping nuclear waste directly into the ocean, making fish flesh even more poisonous.

Nuclear weapons remain a costly distraction from the real security threats we face, like climate change.

The state and the church seldom approve of anything I do. I don't need their approval. I don't aspire to the heterosexual nuclear family model

The computer is a greater threat to the [nuclear] family than all the abortion laws and gay rights movements and pornography in the world.

I studied physics at Princeton when I was a college student, and my initial intention was to major in it but to also be a writer. What I discovered, because it was a very high-powered physics program with its own fusion reactor, was that to keep up with my fellow students in that program I would need to dedicate myself to math and physics all the time and let writing go. And I couldn't let writing go, so I let physics go and became a science fan and a storyteller.

For while the threat of nuclear holocaust has been significantly reduced, the world remains a very unsettled and dangerous place.