Top 1200 Nuclear Missiles Quotes & Sayings - Page 17

I agree that we need a working relationship with Russia to deescalate a nuclear arms race, to resolve the crisis in Syria.

There is total unanimity that the most serious threat facing the United States and Israel is a nuclear-armed Iran.

Except for fools and madmen, everyone knows that nuclear war would he an unprecedented human catastrophe.

Getting ready for a global pandemic is every bit as important as nuclear deterrence and avoiding a climate catastrophe.

When we look up at night and view the stars, everything we see is shinning because of distant nuclear fusion.

Look: I don't want to live with a nuclear Iran. I would like to make it uncomfortable for them to seek it.

The only time I've been arrested was in opposing the Marble Hill nuclear power plant in Indiana. That was in 1979.

The only thing that will stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons is regime change in Tehran.

Time is running out for Iran to address the international community's growing concerns about its nuclear program.

[Should] Iraq acquire fissile material, it would be able to build a nuclear weapon within a year.

The salvation of the world ultimately lies in moving towards universal nuclear disarmament, but that's a long distance away.

I doubt nuclear power will play a much larger role than it does now.

Hillary Clinton's policies unleashed ISIS, spread terrorism and put Iran on a path to nuclear weapons.

The nature and scope of security threats in the cyber era are four-dimensional compared to the early nuclear age.

The sun is the only safe nuclear reactor, situated as it is some ninety-three million miles away.

I do think we are seeing the definition of what is a carrier changing. You can turn America-class amphibious assault ships into smaller, less expensive versions of carriers. You can equip surface ships like destroyers as well as submarines with not just missiles and torpedoes but drones than can do roles traditionally performed by carrier aircraft, like surveillance or even strike, such as finding and taking out opponents' missile batteries.

We should learn to tolerate nuclear weapons of North Korea just like we did the Soviet Union.

It has been the policy of the United States, Democrats and Republicans, to do everything we could to reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons remain a costly distraction from the real security threats we face, like climate change.

Reducing the nuclear danger will require a universal, consistent opposition to all forms of weapons development

I don't think that the United States cares. They just assume that North Korea will soon have nuclear weapons.

Britain's independent possession of nuclear weapons has turned into a political touchstone for commitment to national defense, but this is an illusion.

My priority is to repeal the Iran Nuclear Deal and vote to do that. I think it's extremely dangerous... you don't negotiate with terrorists.

Concrete steps are needed to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in military plans, doctrines, and policies.

A likely source for terrorists seeking to buy or steal nuclear materials is the former Soviet Union.

The no-first-use policy for nuclear weapons was a well thought out stand... We don't intend to reverse it.

The public should always be notified as soon as possible in the event of a leak or other emergency at a nuclear facility.

Some have become more critical than others; for example, the submarines. And that's the Ohio Class submarine that needs to be modernized. The air component also needs to be modernized. The B-52, as someone earlier pointed out, is an outdated model that was flown by the grandparents of people that are flying it now. And we need a serious modernization program as well on our silo-launched missiles. All three are critical for the defense of the country.

Nuclear arms and atomic power represent a technology in which coexistence with man is extremely difficult.

The United States government first learned of the diversion of the W-88 nuclear warhead design in late 1995.

Next in Iran, Hillary Clinton launched the negotiations that brought about the worst nuclear deal in history.

I very strongly supported the agreement which makes certain that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon.

Donald Trump is a person who has been very cavalier, even casual about the use of nuclear weapons.

We are safer if there are not nuclear arsenals around the planet that can be utilized, stolen, sold to terrorists and others who would do harm.

Nothing erodes [a mother's love]. It is not sand on a beach. It is the nuclear heart of things-hard as the rock of this earth.

For nuclear power to have a future, we'll either need more Yucca Mountains or a way to decrease the stuff we put there.

Those who insist on transferring the Iranian nuclear dossier to the UN Security Council have received an additional argument for doing so.

Iran is determined to use peaceful nuclear technology and no intimidation or threat can make us give it up.

So long as nuclear weapons continue to exist, so will the temptation to threaten others with overwhelming military force.

What you tend to find in the personal lives of brilliant men is devastation akin to a nuclear bomb going off.

The Obama presidency has two great missions: fixing the economy, and preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons.

Nuclear apocalypse - who do you need? Actors are probably not top of the list. What can I do for you? I can pretend to be somebody who can grow you some nice crops.

Barack Obama has injected fresh momentum into efforts - stalled for a decade - to bring about nuclear disarmament.

It is in the U.S. interest to engage Iran in serious negotiations - on both regional security and the nuclear challenge it poses.

Iran is five to 10 years away from having a nuclear weapon. We have time to try diplomacy.

It has always been clear that any use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic humanitarian consequences.

We are one with God and He loves us. Now if that isn't a hazard to this country-How're we gonna keep building nuclear weapons?

I don't wanna die in a nuclear war, I want to sail away to a distant shore, and make like an apeman.

I especially remain firmly opposed to a nuclear Iran and will review all related policies and proposed actions from that position.

Chemical and biological attacks are scary and will kill a lot of people but don't rise to the level of nuclear.

Real power in the modern world is determined by a nation's economic capabilities, not just the nuclear warheads it stores.

One point I like to stress is that we should think of coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear, as clean energy.

The state and the church seldom approve of anything I do. I don't need their approval. I don't aspire to the heterosexual nuclear family model

Having served in both Pakistan and India, I'm familiar with how their nuclear armament influenced regional stability.

The Arabs are ready to accept a strong Israel with nuclear arms - all it has to do is open the gates of its fortress and make peace.

Anyone who says that Iran will commit suicide with its nuclear power is a moron and has no business in discussion.

The danger of terrorists and rogue states is compounded by the proliferation of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons.

There is evidence that some of al Qaeda's nuclear efforts over the years met with swindles and false leads.

Nuclear apocalypse-who do you need? Actors are probably not top of the list. What can I do for you? I can pretend to be somebody who can grow you some nice crops.

Chemical and biological attacks are scary and will kill a lot of people but dont rise to the level of nuclear.