Top 1200 Nuclear Proliferation Quotes & Sayings - Page 17

We are one with God and He loves us. Now if that isn't a hazard to this country-How're we gonna keep building nuclear weapons?

There is total unanimity that the most serious threat facing the United States and Israel is a nuclear-armed Iran.

The public should always be notified as soon as possible in the event of a leak or other emergency at a nuclear facility.

When decisions on nuclear power stations and runways are delayed and the government dilly-dallies, people think they aren't important.

Next in Iran, Hillary Clinton launched the negotiations that brought about the worst nuclear deal in history.

So long as nuclear weapons continue to exist, so will the temptation to threaten others with overwhelming military force.

The United States government first learned of the diversion of the W-88 nuclear warhead design in late 1995.

The only thing that really scales up apart from nuclear is solar power from other people's deserts.

You know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button.

We must not allow the Iranian regime to use the nation's vast energy resource as a financial pipeline for its nuclear ambitions.

President Obama has made it clear that the United States is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Barack Obama has injected fresh momentum into efforts - stalled for a decade - to bring about nuclear disarmament.

Both Ulysses and Finnegans Wake are inexhaustible. They are celebrations of the ordinary, compelling reactions to philosophical elitism about "the good life". I hope to examine both of them further, doing more justice to Joycean comedy than I did in my "invitation" to the Wake, and trying to understand how the extraordinary stylistic innovations, particularly the proliferation of narrative forms, enable Joyce to "see life foully" from a vast number of sides.

That's the trouble with cookbooks. Like sex education and nuclear physics, they are founded on an illusion. They bespeak order, but they end in tears.

For while the threat of nuclear holocaust has been significantly reduced, the world remains a very unsettled and dangerous place.

We have a safe and good command-and-control system. Nobody can take away any nuclear weapon from Pakistan.

I would characterize current US nuclear weapons policy as immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous

Even in this nuclear thing, [ Donald Trump] says we should be stronger and expand. What does that mean? So, what is concrete in what he's saying?

The fundamental premise is that neither the United States or the international community is going to allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.

Nuclear weapons remain a costly distraction from the real security threats we face, like climate change.

Real power in the modern world is determined by a nation's economic capabilities, not just the nuclear warheads it stores.

This is one of the worst deals ever made by any country in history. The deal with Iran will lead to nuclear problems.

I very strongly supported the agreement which makes certain that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon.

I especially remain firmly opposed to a nuclear Iran and will review all related policies and proposed actions from that position.

Britain's independent possession of nuclear weapons has turned into a political touchstone for commitment to national defense, but this is an illusion.

The state and the church seldom approve of anything I do. I don't need their approval. I don't aspire to the heterosexual nuclear family model

I grew up in a very healthy nuclear family, and I was fortunate enough to not have to deal with loss and grief as a child.

Nuclear apocalypse-who do you need? Actors are probably not top of the list. What can I do for you? I can pretend to be somebody who can grow you some nice crops.

There are nuclear-weapons-free zones in several parts of the world already, except that they're not implemented fully, because the U.S. won't allow it.

Inter Services Intelligence-aided sleeper modules within the country are more dangerous than a nuclear bomb.

Donald Trump is a person who has been very cavalier, even casual about the use of nuclear weapons.

The salvation of the world ultimately lies in moving towards universal nuclear disarmament, but that's a long distance away.

Washington's adventuristic policy, whipping up international tension to the utmost, is pushing mankind towards nuclear catastrophe.

For nuclear power to have a future, we'll either need more Yucca Mountains or a way to decrease the stuff we put there.

The nuclear arsenal that Pakistan has, I believe is secure. I think the government and the military have taken adequate steps to protect that.

The whitewashing of windows can provide very effective protection against fire resulting from the heat-flash from nuclear explosions.

Iran is determined to use peaceful nuclear technology and no intimidation or threat can make us give it up.

For decades, Iran has covertly worked to develop a nuclear weapons program and has repeatedly violated its international obligations.

It is not viable for one country to demand a right to increase and upgrade its nuclear weapons capabilities while asking others to eliminate theirs.

Amazingly, we take for granted that instinct for survival, fear of death, must separate us from the happiness of pure and uninterpreted experience, in which body, mind, and nature are the same. This retreat from wonder, the backing away like lobsters into safe crannies, the desperate instinct that our life passes unlived, is reflected in proliferation without joy, corrosive money rot, the gross befouling of the earth and air and water from which we came.

Since the advent of nuclear weapons, it seems clear that there is no longer any alternative to peace, if there is to be a happy and well world.

The Highway Code can't be that difficult to understand, and yet my brain seems to treat it as a set of nuclear fission instructions in Old Japanese.

But beyond all that, the question that is continually begged is why isn't America leading the way toward total abolition of nuclear weapons.

The nature and scope of security threats in the cyber era are four-dimensional compared to the early nuclear age.

The state and the church seldom approve of anything I do. I don't need their approval. I don't aspire to the heterosexual nuclear family model.

The only time I've been arrested was in opposing the Marble Hill nuclear power plant in Indiana. That was in 1979.

I don't think that the United States cares. They just assume that North Korea will soon have nuclear weapons.

If you're Iran's minister of defense, I think you'd try to develop at least one nuclear weapon to save yourself from what happened to Iraq.

As long as I'm president of the United States Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. I made that clear when I came into office.

What you tend to find in the personal lives of brilliant men is devastation akin to a nuclear bomb going off.

A total nuclear freeze is counterproductive - especially now, when technology is rapidly changing and the Soviets have some important strategic advantages.

I believe the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction presents the greatest threat that the world has ever known. We are finding more and more countries who are acquiring technology - not only missile technology - and are developing chemical weapons and biological weapons capabilities to be used in theater and also on a long range basis. So I think that is perhaps the greatest threat that any of us will face in the coming years.

The Obama presidency has two great missions: fixing the economy, and preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons.

Designing new low-yield nuclear weapons for limited strikes dangerously lowers the threshold for their use.

My brain knows best-before dates are a con; my panicky gut treats them like a nuclear countdown.

Those who insist on transferring the Iranian nuclear dossier to the UN Security Council have received an additional argument for doing so.

I agree that we need a working relationship with Russia to deescalate a nuclear arms race, to resolve the crisis in Syria.

The trick in nuclear strategy is to maintain stability by balancing potentials and thus to discourage events from converting the hypothetical to the actual.

Time is running out for Iran to address the international community's growing concerns about its nuclear program.

The computer is a greater threat to the [nuclear] family than all the abortion laws and gay rights movements and pornography in the world.