Top 1200 Redistribution Of Wealth Quotes & Sayings - Page 2

Wealth in activity--capital with all its friction--is far safer than invested wealth lying dead.

The only wealth which you will keep forever is the wealth you have given away.

The distribution of wealth is even more unequal than that of income. ...The wealthiest 5% of American households held 54% of all wealth reported in the 1989 survey. Their share rose to 61% in 2010 and reached 63% in 2013. By contrast, the rest of those in the top half of the wealth distribution ?families that in 2013 had a net worth between $81,000 and $1.9 million ?held 43% of wealth in 1989 and only 36% in 2013.

I believe that any society that allows the creation of legitimate wealth expects that the wealth be used for its benefit.

the possession of wealth, and especially the inheritance of wealth, seems almost invariably to sterilize genius.

If exclusive privileges were not granted, and if the financial system would not tend to concentrate wealth, there would be few great fortunes and no quick wealth. When the means of growing rich is divided between a greater number of citizens, wealth will also be more evenly distributed; extreme poverty and extreme wealth would be also rare.

The market economy is very good at wealth creation but not perfect at all about wealth distribution.

Voluntary exchange is more moral than forced redistribution.

Natural wealth is limited and easily obtained; the wealth defined by vain fancies is always beyond reach.

We are, after all, only trustees of the wealth we possess. Without the community and its resources... there would be little wealth for anyone.

Wealth is good, and if it comes our way we will take it; but a gentleman does not sell himself for wealth.

Police and firefighters are great, but they don't create wealth. They protect it. That's crucial. Teaching is a wonderful profession. Teachers help educate people to become good citizens so that citizens can then go create wealth. But they don't create the wealth themselves.

The wealth that increases by giving, That wealth is knowledge and is supreme of all possessions.

The only wealth you keep is the wealth that you give away.

The government can destroy wealth but it cannot create wealth, which is the product of labor and management working with creation.

The true defense against wealth is not a fear of wealth - of its fragility and of the vicious consequences that it can bring - the true defense against wealth is an indifference to money.

A gold standard is the ideal monetary system for those who create wealth through ingenuity, entrepreneurship, and hard work. Gold standards are disfavored by those who do not create wealth but instead seek to extract wealth from others through inflation, inside information, and market manipulation.

You see, there are many types of wealth and money is only one of them. I have different wealths, like the wealth of my health.

My experience indicates that most people who've accumulated a great deal of wealth haven't had that as their goal at all. Wealth is only a by-product, not the original motivation.

When you read Marx (or Jesus) this way, you come to see that real wealth is not material wealth and real poverty is not just the lack of food, shelter, and clothing. Real poverty is the belief that the purpose of life is acquiring wealth and owning things. Real wealth is not the possession of property but the recognition that our deepest need, as human beings, is to keep developing our natural and acquired powers to relate to other human beings.

This wise man observed that wealth is a tool of freedom. But the pursuit of wealth is the way to slavery.

But what sets Europe apart is we insist on a social model that consists of solidarity, equal opportunity and a certain amount of redistribution.

The amassing of unfettered wealth of individuals and corporations should stop. The inheritance of rich people's wealth by their children should stop. The expropriators should have their wealth expropriated and redistributed.

Most people have it all wrong about wealth in America. Wealth is not the same as income. If you make a good income each year and spend it all, you are not getting wealthier. You are just living high. Wealth is what you accumulate, not what you spend.

It is commonly observed that a sudden wealth, like a prize drawn in a lottery or a large bequest to a poor family, does not permanently enrich. They have served no apprenticeship to wealth, and with the rapid wealth come rapid claims which they do not know how to deny, and the treasure is quickly dissipated.

If you have good wealth mentality.... you will generate wealth wherever you go. Even if you lose money temporarily, your wealth mentality will attract it again. If you have a lack mentality, no matter how much you receive or what financial opportunities come your way, wealth will evade you or, if it comes, it won't last.

It is easy to understand that the nearer we live to the source of wealth, the more wealth we shall receive.

If we have not developed a reservoir of spiritual wealth, no amount of money is likely to make us happy. Spiritual wealth provides faith. It gives us love. It brings and expands wisdom. Spiritual wealth leads to happiness because it guides us into useful or loving relationships.

We've become a culture where earning money doesn't entitle you to it, but wanting it does. That is the essence of redistribution.

The true nature of all wealth is temporary; those who have wealth must here and now do good deeds that will live for a long time.

Anyone, without any great penetration, may distinguish the dispositions consequent on wealth; for its possessors are insolent and overbearing, from being tainted in a certain way by the getting of their wealth. For they are affected as though they possessed every good; since wealth is a sort of standard of the worth of other things; whence every thing seems to be purchasable by it.

Your wealth is waiting for you in the invisible, and to bring it into the visible, think wealth!

Low class men desire wealth;middle class men both wealth and respect; but the noble, honour only; hence honour is the noble man's true wealth.

The lower half of households by wealth held just 3% of wealth in 1989 and only 1% in 2013.

Capital is that part of wealth which is devoted to obtaining further wealth.

The most valuable wealth of a man is his knowledge, which cannot be destroyed; all other riches that he has gained are not considered to be wealth at all.

The rich people are those who create wealth, and you have to treat them well so they continue to give wealth.

Wealth is a tool of freedom, but the pursuit of wealth is the way to slavery.

The Democrats, because they believe in socialism, redistribution, forced the banks and financial institutions to make the risky loans.

Diversification may preserve wealth, but concentration builds wealth.

If wealth is accumulated in the hands of a few, either by a feudal or a stock monopoly, it carries the power also; and a government becomes as certainly aristocratical, by a monopoly of wealth, as by a monopoly of arms. A minority, obtaining a majority of wealth or arms in any mode, becomes the government.

New Zealand is not used to wealth. In America wealth is kind of a thing of pride. Here it's the opposite. The more you've got, the bigger the target you are.

O, my God! withhold from me the wealth to which tears and sighs and curses cleave. Better none at all than wealth like that.

You can only confiscate the wealth that exists at a given moment. You cannot confiscate future wealth - and that future wealth is less likely to be produced when people see that it is going to be confiscated.

Lampis the ship owner, on being asked how he acquired his great wealth, replied, My great wealth was acquired with no difficulty, but my small wealth, my first gains, with much labor.

Monetary expansion is a massive scheme of hidden redistribution.

My premise is not to tax to destroy the wealth of the wealthy; it's to increase the wealth of the bottom and the middle class.

Italy and France could lop off their excessive wealth through a one-time tax on private wealth.

[T]he essence of so-called war prosperity: it enriches some by what it takes from others. It is not rising wealth but a shifting of wealth and income.

A safety net for the poor indeed requires some level of income redistribution.

It is investment, i.e. the increased production of material wealth in the shape of capital goods, which alone increases national wealth.

You can gauge a country's wealth, its real wealth, by its tree cover.

I believe wealth should be in the hands of those who know how to create more wealth.

Socialism takes and redistributes wealth, but it is utterly incapable of creating wealth.

The shortest road to wealth lies in the contempt of wealth.

The issue of redistribution of resources and wealth needs to resolved systemically, but in the meantime but there are individual spots you can occupy. There are things that you can do on a daily basis that will make a difference in moving the needle in individual lives. When we look at the mentoring of young black kids, for instance, the number-one mentor group is white women. I think after that maybe it's black women, and then white men, and then black men. We can make all kinds of arguments about that.

The art of wealth-getting which consists in household management, on the one hand, has a limit; the unlimited acquisition of wealth is not its business. And therefore, in one point of view, all riches must have a limit; nevertheless, as a matter of fact, we find the opposite to be the case; for all getters of wealth increase their hard coin without limit.

Wealth is power. With wealth many things are possible.

I don't care about wealth. What seems to be upsetting is institutionalizing the advantages that wealth gives you.

The - the early Rockefellers made their wealth from being in certain businesses and - and remained personally very wealthy. Tatas were different in the sense the future generations were not so wealthy. They - they were involved in the business, but most of the family wealth is put into trust, and the family did not, in fact, enjoy enormous wealth.