Top 1200 Social Innovation Quotes & Sayings

Explore popular Social Innovation quotes.
Last updated on December 3, 2024.
Companies have too many experts who block innovation. True innovation really comes from perpendicular thinking.
Innovation is the specific tool of entrepreneurs, the means by which they exploit change as an opportunity for a different business or a different service. It is capable of being presented as a discipline, capable of being learned, capable of being practiced. Entrepreneurs need to search purposefully for the sources of innovation, the changes and their symptoms that indicate opportunities for successful innovation. And they need to know and to apply the principles of successful innovation.
All too often, a corporate innovation initiative starts and ends with a board meeting mandate to the CEO followed by a series of memos to the staff, with lots of posters and one-day workshops. This typically creates 'innovation theater' but very little innovation.
Invention is the root of innovation. Innovation is the major force for change in the future. — © Philippe Kahn
Invention is the root of innovation. Innovation is the major force for change in the future.
Both SOPA and PIPA are toxic. My view is that anyone who supports these bills either doesn't understand what they are supporting or is simply no friend of innovation. And, if you are no friend of innovation, I can't support you in any way, as innovation is the lifeblood of our economy, our country, and what I've dedicated my life to.
There's so much innovation going on, and there are lots of people funding that innovation, but there's very little innovation on that infrastructure for innovation itself, so we like to do that ourselves to help companies create more tech companies.
Innovation is all about people. Innovation thrives when the population is diverse, accepting and willing to cooperate.
Ambition without knowledge is like a boat on dry land -movie - Karate kid"What is the calculus of innovation?" "The calculus of innovation is really quite simple: knowledge drives innovation, innovation drives productivity, productivity drives our economic growth."
When your focus is social change and not financial change, why wouldn't you want to share that openly? Innovation only succeeds when it's shared.
When your focus is social change and not financial change why wouldn't you want to share that openly? Innovation only succeeds when it's shared.
In India, we have the opportunity to give innovation the kind of scale that no other country in the world can. Innovation is a necessity.
When you prohibit failure, you kill innovation. If you kill innovation in fundraising, you can't raise more revenue. If you can't raise more revenue, you can't grow. And if you can't grow, you can't possibly solve large social problems.
An established company which, in an age demanding innovation, is not able to innovation, is doomed to decline and extinction.
Creativity is an input to innovation and change is the output from innovation. — © Braden Kelley
Creativity is an input to innovation and change is the output from innovation.
We tend to think of innovation as difficult, but with the creative use of The 80/20 Principle innovation can be both easy and fun!
Transparency may be the most disruptive and far-reaching innovation to come out of social media.
Changes that are being enhanced by technological innovation (social media being a case in point) are happening at an increasing rate.
If an innovative piece of software comes along, Microsoft copies it and makes it part of Windows. This is not innovation; this is the end of innovation.
Someone once said that innovation is a done idea. I agree. I believe that creativity is the individual development and conceptualization and that innovation in an organizational sense is implementing ideas and intentions that come from that creativity. So in a sense, creativity is more a leadership function and innovation is more a managerial function.
The real work of social innovation is to fix our broken human systems.
What really makes the difference in innovation is whether the corporate culture is paying attention to innovation.
The role of innovation inside the company is so important. That's how we get growth, and there's no way to drive innovation without learning and change.
Social incubators not only create economic impact but also have impact across sectors, such as healthcare, education, and the environment. As the interest in social innovation increases, there is a greater need to help existing programs improve and build new programs.
Rapid innovation is the cure for the ills we face, but because innovation is difficult and susceptible to failure, we might need to rethink the way we approach innovation and how we drive it through our companies.
Sustainable solutions based on innovation can create a more resilient world only if that innovation is focused on the health and well-being of its inhabitants. And it is at that point - where technology and human needs intersect - that we will find meaningful innovation.
I think innovation as a discipline needs to go back and get rethought and revived. There are so many models to talk about innovation, there are so many typologies of innovation, and you have to find a good innovation metric that truly captures the innovation performance of a company.
I believe in innovation and that the way you get innovation is you fund research and you learn the basic facts.
Leapfrog innovation - consistent, constant, ridiculous leapfrog innovation - only happens within a dictatorship. Any time you try to do something really innovative, most people aren't going to understand it until after they experience it. So when you're developing in innovation, you have to be a dictator.
Innovation and commerce are as powerful tools for creating social progress as they are for driving technological advancement.
Creativity and innovation are something you can’t flowchart out. Some things you can, and we do, and we’re very disciplined in those areas. But creativity isn’t one of those. A lot of companies have innovation departments, and this is always a sign that something is wrong when you have a VP of innovation or something. You know, put a for-sale sign on the door.
If you open up the mind, the opportunity to address both profits and social conditions are limitless. It's a process of innovation.
People always ask why I stay in the online space versus going to TV or film, like most people would do, and the answer is that there's opportunity for innovation online - not only innovation in storytelling, but also innovation in how you interact with your audience and that is very fulfilling to me personally.
The top principle for disruptive and sustaining innovation is that it has to have a laser focus on customers. Innovation begins with their needs and expectations.
It is through technological innovation and the pursuit of sustainable social, economic, and ecological development that we can chart the country's path to progress and power a greener tomorrow.
It's the unlikely juxtaposition of creativity and logic which causes the wooliness and confusion around the term 'innovation'. Everybody wants to be innovative; many companies and ideas are proclaimed to be innovative and no one doubts that innovation is a money spinner. And, thus, we are all looking for the magic formula. Well, here you go: Creativity + Iterative Development = Innovation.
Innovation is a subset of creativity. Innovation often deals with product launches and is often relegated to the C-suite or to heads of R&D departments. Innovation requires creativity, but creativity is something that is much more broad. It applies to people at all levels of an organization. Today, we all are responsible for delivering "everyday creativity". Small creative acts that add up to big things.
I have always been interested in innovation but I was never able to find innovation inside of disciplinary boundaries.
Ideation is not a synonym for innovation, conformity is not its simple antonym, and innovation is not the automatic consequence of "creative thinking.".
Part of me thinks that innovation, real innovation in health care delivery, needs to happen from the bottom to the top. — © Malcolm Gladwell
Part of me thinks that innovation, real innovation in health care delivery, needs to happen from the bottom to the top.
I know in my state, I am leading innovation and we need to diversify the economy. But you can't have innovation unless you have education.
The paradox of innovation is that it is accepted as an innovation when it has become imitation.
Trust is consistently seen as a make or break component of innovation - particularly because the freedom to fail is an important part of innovation.
Our Government understands that local, community organizations are essential in addressing social issues like economic development, poverty, education and integration in Canadian communities. The Community and College Social Innovation Fund will connect the innovative talent of researchers and students at colleges and polytechnics to meet the research needs of local community organizations to build stronger, safer, healthier communities.
The biggest innovation of all is social networking, and cellular technology is the facilitator for social networking. People are mobile; social networking is people, and the only way people connect with each other is wirelessly.
Prosperity in human society is misunderstood. The difference between a rich and poor society is the number of problems that society solves for its citizens. That means technological innovation is the source of all prosperity, but with every tech innovation, you also get disruption - ultimately, social and civic disruption.
Innovation-the heart of the knowledge economy-is fundamentally social.
I think that size is not the key to innovation. Scale doesn't confirm an innovation advantage.
Not only do innovators have to deal with all of the fundamental challenges of innovation, they have to do so in an environment that often is implicitly hostile towards innovation.
Innovation is everything. When you're on the forefront, you can see what the next innovation needs to be. When you're behind, you have to spend your energy catching up. — © Robert Noyce
Innovation is everything. When you're on the forefront, you can see what the next innovation needs to be. When you're behind, you have to spend your energy catching up.
Innovation often starts with the ordinary. They simply took what was "normal", and added a twist. They added an innovation. The innovation solved a key problem of the "normal" use case that we all already understood.
Once IBM gains control of a market sector, they almost always stop innovation. They prevent innovation from happening.
We should all seek to innovate, or be curious about innovation. Innovation truly is one of our greatest gifts.
At the core, Philips is an innovation company. And for innovation to work, you need to look for the unmet needs.
Intellectual-property rules are clearly necessary to spur innovation: if every invention could be stolen, or every new drug immediately copied, few people would invest in innovation. But too much protection can strangle competition and can limit what economists call 'incremental innovation' - innovations that build, in some way, on others.
One of the banes of successful innovation is that companies may be so committed to innovation that they will give the innovators a lot of money to spend.
In the eighties and nineties, the innovation agenda was exclusively focused on enterprises. There was a time in which economic and social issues were seen as separate. Economy was producing wealth, society was spending. In the 21st century economy, this is not true anymore. Sectors like health, social services and education have a tendency to grow, in GDP percentage as well as in creating employment, whereas other industries are decreasing. In the long term, an innovation in social services or education will be as important as an innovation in the pharmaceutical or aerospatial industry.
There is this group of people who love innovation. Those people want to innovate, and they think the Internet is a wonderful tool for innovation, which is true. But you also have to remember that much of that innovation is constrained within the realities of the foreign policy.
Changes call for innovation, and innovation leads to progress.
If you look across the economy, if you have multiple players in an industry, you have more customization, more innovation, greater choice for consumers. The more you have consolidation, the less likely you are to invest in innovation. It becomes all about driving down cost and mass production. And that's not good for innovation in an industry.
Innovation is a good thing. The human condition - put aside bioterrorism and a few footnotes - is improving because of innovation.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!