For me, Spotify is not even a necessary evil. It helps me do what I want to do.
Whenever you put out music, you're just rolling the dice, and the nice thing with Spotify is they're willing to roll them with you.
I was brought onboard to strengthen the bridge between Spotify and the music community.
Spotify has paid more than two billion dollars to labels, publishers and collecting societies for distribution to songwriters and recording artists.
Spotify was one of the first services that actually focuses on the consumer because they don't have to spend hundreds of dollars a year on music.
I'm on Spotify and Soundcloud all the time.
Spotify - I met those guys before they launched in America and was wildly excited about the idea. 'Wow, this is all the music in the world, for a flat fee.'
I'm down with Spotify. I don't know all the financial details but generally it's a great resource.
The insomnia just perpetuates. I have one bad night, then I get it in my head that I can't sleep. I've been trying these meditation tapes - there are a couple on Spotify - and they're meant to calm you. But they don't seem to work.
When I'm getting ready, I'll listen to '80s music on Spotify just to wake me up and put me in the mood. I like that it's cheesy.
I use Spotify to listen to music when I am taking a shower and when I am doing projects.
With iTunes and Spotify and Pandora and this and that, you don't need to buy CDs any more.
I have a weekly playlist on Spotify called Mixtape Mondays. So every Sunday night, I sit around listening to tunes to place. It's becoming my favorite part of the week.
Some artists and indie musicians see Spotify fairly positively - as a way of getting noticed, of getting your music out there where folks can hear it risk-free.
Spotify, Tidal, and even YouTube, to a degree, are vast and rich troves of music, but they primarily function as search engines organized by algorithms. You typically have to know what you're looking for in order to find it.
I think Spotify is honestly just another one of Sean Parker's ways of ripping musicians off.
Even Apple, notorious for keeping a tight grip on its products, allows fierce competitors like Google, Amazon, Spotify, and Microsoft to offer their apps on its phones and tablets.
Back before Napster and Spotify, we toured to promote record sales.
Now we make records to promote tour dates.
What Spotify pays me is not even enough to pay the musicians playing with me or the people working on the discs. It's not working. Something is going to have to give.
People are experimenting with streaming, with subscription services, whether it's a Spotify or a Pandora or a Rdio.
The fact that 'Honey, I'm Good' made such a splash and that people were catching it on radio, on Spotify, on Pandora, it's driving everybody to go hear the album.
I feel like Drake could literally put out anything - like, the sound of seagulls over a beat - and it could be the Number One song on Spotify.
Ever since Napster I've dreamt of building a product similar to Spotify.
I'm so grateful to Spotify for the enormous support to the reggaeton movement.
Spotify is a platform: it could be expanded to other types of content.
The difference between Spotify and Internet radio services like Pandora is that Spotify is interactive. You can sample the complete catalogue of most artists' recordings.
'Me Like Yuh' got, like, 20 million plays on Spotify.
Spotify wants to make consuming music simpler and at the same time pay the rights owners.
Daniel Ek, the C.E.O. of Spotify, is a rock star of the tech world, but he is not long on charisma.
I think Spotify really does help. If you're going with the evolution of music these days, it's only becoming more and more popular and I don't think it's something to be shunned.
The facts show that the music industry was much better off before Spotify hit these shores.
Spotify is returning a huge amount of money. We'll overtake iTunes in terms of what we bring to the record industry in under two years.
I imagine if Spotify becomes something that people are willing to pay for, then I'm sure iTunes will just create their own service, and they're actually fair to artists.
The owner of Spotify is worth something like 3 billion dollars ... he's richer than Paul McCartney and he's 30 and he's never written a song.
I'm not even fifty yet, but I still feel like Instagram and Spotify - I'm trying to stay with it! It's not easy. The world is going so fast.
I don't look at Spotify or Rdio or any of these guys as a direct competitor: I look at other forms of entertainment as the competitor.
Sure, we all like listening to music on vinyl, but that doesn't mean streaming music on Spotify is bad.
This is a way for artists to communicate directly to their fans. If you think of an artist like Bruno Mars, he's using Spotify, creating playlists and listening to music through it.
I honestly believe going independent is the future. Social is changing, Spotify is changing, everything is changing.
When you listen to music through Spotify, you don't own the song, even though you might be able to listen to it at any time.
I'm not saying you can't be successful in the music industry without Spotify. But when I look at the future of music, I don't think scarcity is the model anymore. We have to embrace ubiquity - that music is everywhere.
If I make a song, and it's my song, like 'Lean On,' we're going to make money off the synchs, the Spotify, and we get to headline festivals on it. That's the model I want to explore.
The main reason people want to pay for Spotify is really portability. People are saying, 'I want to have my music with me.'
Spotify stresses me the hell out.
Spotify will dramatically change my industry.
My Spotify consists of... definitely Juice WRLD. Comethazine. Ty$.
The subscriptions were working so well, and on top of that, we saw the success of Netflix and Spotify and thought, 'We can create a similar kind of experience for books.'
If you look at something like Spotify, many record labels are investors in the company. So from that standpoint, the money is all going back into the labels.
With places like Spotify and YouTube broadcasting these days, you get a track made in San Francisco broadcasting in London moments later, so it's more global now.
With Spotify, I think people are discovering a lot of artists they might not discover otherwise.
The 'solution' to file sharing was never centralizing content control back to a few entities - that was the struggle we were fighting for. Netflix, Spotify etc. are not a solution but a loss.
Just because you listen to The National, Spotify might tell you that you want to listen to The Lumineers' music. Well, maybe you don't.
I'm trying my best to keep things exactly the same. Spotify hasn't changed my process other than doubling up. We do twice a week now.
With Spotify and all those streaming services, you don't get paid anything. You have to be, like, Madonna or something to actually make a real royalty from that.
I have a song coming with blackbear. He's a huge artist, I would say in the dark-pop scene. He has also collaborated with a lot of hip-hop artists. He's huge on Spotify.
There are a number of start-ups in Europe that are able to reach beyond their own country. Take Spotify - Spotify just in Sweden isn't that interesting compared to Spotify all over the world.
With Spotify, people don't get it until they try it. Then they tell their friends.
Spotify favors hits. It's very much a meritocracy: It's not like radio, where whatever is being played is what you hear. We offer songs up, and from there, it's up to consumers to stream the music or not.
I worked with a great photographer called Rafael Pavarotti a while ago and he's got some amazing playlists on Spotify.
Ever since Apple Music, Spotify, and all of those things came around, we can choose whatever we want to listen to. Before then, it was all controlled, but now, everybody listens to everything.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience.
More info...