Top 1200 Supreme Court Justice Quotes & Sayings - Page 6

Explore popular Supreme Court Justice quotes.
Last updated on December 21, 2024.
The Supreme Court of the United States has validated the Nazi method of execution in concentration camps, starving them to death.
We have never had a president of the United States or a nominee of a major party who was a Supreme Court law clerk.
I think the Supreme Court does have the authority, which is not used, to declare a blanket right for all people, all adults. — © Jack Kevorkian
I think the Supreme Court does have the authority, which is not used, to declare a blanket right for all people, all adults.
The Supreme Court of the United States... has validated the Nazi method of execution in... concentration camps, starving them to death.
As the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case has shown us, separate is not always equal.
Brown v. Board of Education was arguably the most important decision of the Supreme Court in the 20th century.
I'm very upset that the Supreme Court ruled that citizens don't have standing to challenge the faith based initiatives on constitutional grounds.
The felonious five in their Supreme Court decision never said Gore did anything improperly in Florida.
The nation will be shaped for decades by decisions that are made by President Bush and the Senate about the future of the Supreme Court.
Nothing raises the national temperature more than a VACANCY sign hanging from the colonnaded front of the Supreme Court.
Any Supreme Court confirmation needs to be a thoughtful process, with full respect for the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution.
It's our last chance [November 8, 2016]. And that includes Supreme Court justices and Second Amendment. Remember that.
The tedious and convoluted reasoning behind the Supreme Court's ongoing project to expunge all references to God from the public domain. — © Benjamin Hart
The tedious and convoluted reasoning behind the Supreme Court's ongoing project to expunge all references to God from the public domain.
I am bound by the laws of the United States and all 50 states...I am not bound by any case or any court to which I myself am not a party...I don't think the Congress of the United States is subservient to the courts...They can ignore a Supreme Court ruling if they so choose.
We are confident that the Supreme Court will soon see the direction that this country is headed and enshrine marriage as a constitutional right for all.
You can't have one, two, three more picks on the Supreme Court go against our Second Amendment rights.
If money is a form of speech, as the Supreme Court has regrettably found, rich donors will always be the loudest speakers.
Short of the passage of a Constitutional Amendment protecting marriage as between one man and one woman, the U.S. Supreme Court has the final say.
The Supreme Court has also issued and never reversed a number of decisions that are repugnant to the Constitution's vision of human dignity and equality.
PM Modi's irresponsible behaviour and an overzealous Supreme Court will damage the Indian federal structure.
The Supreme Court's only armor is the cloak of public trust; its sole ammunition, the collective hopes of our society.
Donald Trump has shouted 'hoax' hundreds of times, about everything from climate change to Supreme Court rulings to impeachment.
I'm really proud of this Supreme Court and the way they've been dealing with the issue of First Amendment political speech.
There are a lot of wonderful people in America who shouldn't be on the Supreme Court - and a lot who should be on the court who aren't such wonderful people.
Court... a place where they dispense with justice.
With Citizens United, the Supreme Court's declaration that corporations are people, the whims of one can silence the voices of millions.
We've got a deeply flawed political system with an insane overreaching extremist element, with a Supreme Court that is completely loony.
Our Supreme Court has been very clear that the government can't just simply say something and make it so.
I was covering the Supreme Court when it decided Gideon v. Wainright, and the case has always had special meaning for me.
This is the most historic moment in Supreme Court history in our lifetime, no question about it. These are justices who are going to serve for decades.
The country is yearning for a change. I'd rather take my chances on somebody new, particularly with regard to the Supreme Court.
If it gets to the Supreme Court, I'll have the directors of every museum in the country as expert testimony that my work is legitimate art.
Through its interpretation of the Constitution, the Supreme Court hugely shapes the fabric of our society for us and for future generations.
Let's stand together, stick together, and work together for justice of every description. Racial justice. Gender justice. Immigrant justice. Economic justice. Environmental justice.
I feel that at this point in our country's history, it is important that we not reverse marriage equality, that we not reverse Roe v. Wade, that we stand up against Citizens United, we stand up for the rights of people in the workplace, that we stand up and basically say: The Supreme Court should represent all of us. That's how I see the court, and the kind of people that I would be looking to nominate to the court would be in the great tradition of standing up to the powerful, standing up on behalf of our rights as Americans.
I am very pleased with President Trump's selection of Judge Neil Gorsuch as his first appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court.
When the Supreme Court moved to Washington in 1800, it was provided with no books, which probably accounts for the high quality of early opinions.
Installing an activist liberal majority on the Supreme Court will put religious liberties at risk for generations to come. — © Mercedes Schlapp
Installing an activist liberal majority on the Supreme Court will put religious liberties at risk for generations to come.
The Supreme Court has increasingly come down on the side of big corporations instead of workers and middle-class families.
Over the course of 19 years on the Supreme Court, I learned some lessons about the Constitution of the United States.
We need clarification regarding the death penalty. It's different in many states... It's a bit different throughout the country, so I look forward to Judge Gorsuch being on the court, Justice Gorsuch being on the court, and bringing some clarification to those issues.
The Second Amendment does protect the right to people to possess weapons for self-defense in the home. That's what the Supreme Court said.
Until lawmakers can disentangle property taxes from public education, inequalities - perpetuated by the Supreme Court and Congress - will persist.
Whether D.C. residents will be full-fledged citizens seems to be a case worthy of the Supreme Court.
The Founding Fathers provided a way to reverse unpopular Supreme Court decisions: a constitutional amendment.
There is no such thing as justice - in or out of court.
I would sooner receive injustice in the Queen's courts than justice in a foreign court. I hold that man or woman to be a scoundrel who goes abroad to a foreign court to have the judgments of the Queen's courts overturned, the actions of her Government countermanded or the legislation of Parliament struck down.
In my first week as a U.S. senator, I had the privilege of participating in the Supreme Court confirmation hearing for Judge Sonia Sotomayor. — © Al Franken
In my first week as a U.S. senator, I had the privilege of participating in the Supreme Court confirmation hearing for Judge Sonia Sotomayor.
One is entitled to say without qualification that the correlation between prior judicial experience and fitness for the Supreme Court is zero.
It's a long, uphill fight to get back to original orthodoxy. We have two 'originalists' on the Supreme Court. That's something.
Free speech has been used by the Supreme Court to give immense power to the wealthiest members of our society.
Voter fraud does just barely exist, while racism, according to the Supreme Court, is a thing of the past.
President Obama had two Supreme Court nominees in his first term. There was no filibuster against them.
Let's put it in perspective at the United States Supreme Court, which hears maybe 60 cases a year, most of the cases are resolved without much dispute. The 10 or 15 that are controversial we all know about, and we hear about. The federal courts hear just a tiny sliver of the cases that go to court in this country. Most of the cases are in the state courts. And most legal issues never go to court. So, the legal system is actually not in jeopardy. At the same time, access to law is in jeopardy.
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that marriage is one of the most fundamental rights that we have as Americans under our Constitution.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and the public is entitled to know what the legal views of a Supreme Court candidate are.
The moral foundation of the society, the way we interact with each other is more fundamental than the Supreme Court.
I have never endorsed Roy Moore. Just the fact that he was forced off the state supreme court is enough for me.
I have strong differences with Mr. Trump on a woman's right to choose and what kind of justices belong on the Supreme Court.
We have no prejudiced stand, nor are we aggressive on the Sabarimala issue. The government is duty-bound to implement the Supreme Court order.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!