Top 1200 War On Terrorism Quotes & Sayings - Page 3

Americans are at war with radical Islamic terrorism. We are at war with the ISIS caliphate, and what we need is a commander-in-chief who knows that, who understands that, who will give our military the resources they need to make that fight, pull our allies together - including moderate Arab nations - and hunt down and destroy ISIS and other terrorist organizations at their source.

I dont support terrorism and never have. As a Sri Lankan that fled war and bombings, my music is the voice of the civilian refugee.

The world does not need a war against 'terrorism', it needs a culture of peace based on human rights for all.

Obviously, we will respond to the concerns of any member of Congress. The government of Uzbekistan has been a good partner in the war on terrorism.

We can only move to a long-term resolution regarding terrorism and war by planting seeds of peace. We have to start with ourselves.

I believe terrorism cannot be won over by military action. Terrorism must be condemned in the strongest language. We must stand solidly against it, and find all the means to end it. We must address the root causes of terrorism to end it for all time to come.

American credibility in the war on terrorism depends on a strong stand against all terrorist acts, whether committed by foe or friend.

The challenge we have in the war on terrorism is looking around for those pieces that matter and trying to fit them together.

We have to decide why terrorism is a new threat. There has always been terrorism.

We all have to be concerned about terrorism, but you will never end terrorism by terrorizing others.

I extend my deepest gratitude to our Armed Forces and first responders serving both at home and abroad in the war against terrorism.

We have an interest in combating tactics in war that are abhorrent and that only fuel terrorism because they incite people on the ground.

There's no such thing as a war against terrorism. It's idiotic. These are slogans. These are lies. It's advertising, which is the only art form we ever invented and developed.

Unless and until something concrete is done about addressing the Israeli-Palestinian issue you won't get a real start on the war against terrorism.

Terrorism is everywhere. You think of the tribal terrorism of some African countries.

Ukraine has been a strong partner to the United States on international initiatives and a committed ally in fighting the War on Terrorism.

I admire President Chavez for his strength to resist the United States. Instead, Bush is waging a war of terrorism against the world.

I condemn any form of terrorism and especially the terrorism that would affect my country and me.

The war against terrorism should not be used to interfere with an independent, sovereign state. We need to identify concrete terrorist targets and do no harm to civilians.

I don't support terrorism and never have. As a Sri Lankan that fled war and bombings, my music is the voice of the civilian refugee.

Terrorism and war have something in common. They both involve the killing of innocent people to achieve what the killers believe is a good end.

Yesterday I, along with a bipartisan Congressional Delegation of lawmakers, inspected the detention facilities at Guantanamo used to house individuals detained in the War on Terrorism.

Domestic terrorism has opened new war zones, operating off the assumption that all Americans are potential terrorists.

In order to win the war on terrorism, we have to win the war of information. Information is so very, very valuable. This is an important tool in gathering up information.

My point was simply that the war on global terrorism is going to be a long one, and we need to adapt as our enemy adapts.

State terrorism - and yet the Israeli invasion Goldstone investigated is still commonly referred to as the Gaza War.

So when I say we had been the cowards, yes, that's what I meant, we as a society. And that's everybody, including myself. I had been screaming about the drug war and this war and other wars. I should have been more on terrorism, too. So should you, so should everybody.

American farmers, by making the commitment to grow more corn for ethanol, are at the top of the spear on the war against terrorism.

Who planted terrorism in our area? Some came and took our land, forced us to leave, forced us to live in camps. I think this is terrorism. Using means to resist this terrorism and stop its effects - this is called struggle.

The war against terrorism should not be used to interfere with an independent, sovereign state.We need to identify concrete terrorist targets and do no harm to civilians.

The drama can only be brought to its climax in one of two ways -- through the selective brutality of terrorism or the impartial horrors of war.

The Pakistani government under Musharraf is a strong and key player in the global war on terrorism, and their contribution has been second to none.

I've been interested in terrorism from the very beginning. My first novel is about that, too, and I think one reason I've been so interested in terrorism is because I have a deep interest - one of my deepest interests - in image culture and how it works. And terrorism is an epiphenomenon of image culture.

War on Iraq runs the risk of turning the Middle East into an inexhaustible recruiting ground for anti- western terrorism.

Those are the two issues: Protecting the homeland and stopping the war and going after ISIS in a way that ends the terrorism.

Think of the war against terrorism. In my view, Washington's approach can be compared to a doctor constantly banging away at a tumor instead of removing it surgically.

Richard Clarke had plenty of opportunities to tell us, in the administration, that he thought the war on terrorism was moving in the wrong direction and he chose not to.

Winning the war on terrorism will also require a level of moral clarity that can provide a vision for struggling people and nations everywhere.

We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.

It's important to remember that some of our best sources in the war against radical Islamic terrorism are Muslims, both in America and overseas.

The war being fought in Afghanistan and Iraq is bringing about a fundamental change to the environment that has given rise and power to the extremists who export terrorism.

War on terrorism reflects, in my view, a rather narrow and extremist vision of foreign policy for a superpower and for a great democracy with genuinely idealistic traditions.

I intend to vote for President George W. Bush in the next election, because in my view, he is best able to wage the war against international terrorism.

War is hell, but that's not the half of it, because war is also mystery and terror and adventure and courage and discovery and holiness and pity and despair and longing and love. War is nasty; war is fun. War is thrilling; war is drudgery. War makes you a man; war makes you dead.

You can't think about terrorism without thinking about Palestinian terrorism. Palestinians began international terrorism. It started with them in 1968. They used it as the first resort, not the last resort. They invented it, they perfected it, they benefited from it and they taught the world how to use it and that it would be successful.

There are millions of peaceful Muslims across the world, in countries like India, where there is not the problems we are seeing in nations that are controlled - have territory controlled by Al Qaida or ISIS, and we should direct at the problem, focus on the problem, and defeat radical Islamic terrorism. It's not a war on a faith; it's a war on a political and theocratic ideology that seeks to murder us.

People of the United States have to really consider whether they want to be an empire. Sweden is not worried about terrorism. New Zealand is not worried about terrorism. Holland is not worried about terrorism. Why not be a modest little country without all of these enormous ambitions?

We are familiar with terrorism. But indiscriminate, cross-border, religiously motivated terrorism is new.

Whether it is committed by a group operating within or without the law, terrorism is still terrorism.

When the Jews were being persecuted by the Nazis in 1944 we passed the War Refugee Act, which focused on rescuing Jews, a religious group. But if the religious group is the subject of the persecution based on their religion, it's perfectly OK for a First Amendment-bound society to emphasize their rescue, just as it is perfectly OK to emphasize the fact that many, if not all of the perpetrators of Islamic terrorism, come from countries with a history of supporting terrorism.

I think the forms of terrorism are becoming very diverse, amongst them cyber-terrorism, for example.

A democratic and stable Iraq and Afghanistan are essential to our broader efforts to make no place safe for terrorists and to win the War on Terrorism.

There is no war on terrorism; it is the great game speeded up. The difference is the rampant nature of the superpower, ensuring infinite dangers for us all.

Syria will remain a hotbed of terrorism as long as the civil war, aided and abetted by the Iranians and the Russians, continue.

It's only terrorism if they do it to us. When we do much worse to them, it's not terrorism.

I think it's very important to have a sense of balance in covering the war, but you don't have to be morally neutral about terrorism.

After Sept. 11, there was a reticence and worrying about films that touched on war, and even more on terrorism.

Drugs support terrorism? No, your SUV supports terrorism.

The point I wanted to make was, as we have moved forward on the war on terrorism, FISA has been increasingly effective in terms of results.

After 9/11, we did see Palestinian terrorism in the context of all terrorism.