Top 1200 Weapons Of Mass Destruction Quotes & Sayings - Page 2

The intelligence community was absolutely uniform and uniformly wrong about the existence of weapons of mass destruction (in Iraq).

There's no debate in the world as to whether people have weapons of mass destruction... We all know that. A trained ape knows that.

Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of Islamic extremists will be a disaster for the world.

U.S. officials never expected that 'we were going to open garages and find' weapons of mass destruction.

If Saddam's regime and survival are threatened [by invasion], he will have nothing to lose, and may use everything at his disposal... If weapons of mass destruction land on Israeli soil, killing innocent civilians, the experts I have consulted believe Israel will retaliate, and possibly with nuclear weapons... Nor can we rule out the possibility that Saddam would assault American forces with chemical or biological weapons.

If you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He's already demonstrated a willingness to use these weapons. He poison-gassed his own people. He used poison gas and other weapons of mass destruction against his neighbors. This man has no compunction about killing lots and lots of people. So this is a way to save lives and to save the stability and peace of a region of the world that is important to the peace and security of the entire world.

The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery is a threat to both the Nato allies and Russia.

I have absolutely no doubt at all that we will find evidence of weapons of mass destruction programmes.

Starvation and disease are the original weapons of mass destruction. When you burn fields and kill animals, people are left vulnerable.

The truth was, there was never a connection between Iraq and Osama Bin Laden. There were no weapons of mass destruction, either.

As I have said throughout, I have no doubt that they will find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

China is one of the world's greatest proliferators of weapons of mass destruction to these rogue nations.

The gravest risks from al Qaeda combine its affinity for big targets and its announced desire for weapons of mass destruction.

The development of weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to carry them would be a very destabilizing effect, should Iran be able to accomplish that.

The death toll from small arms dwarfs that of all other weapons systems — and in most years greatly exceeds the toll of the atomic bombs that devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In terms of the carnage they cause, small arms, indeed, could well be described as 'weapons of mass destruction'.

?Governments accountable to the voters focus on building roads and schools?not weapons of mass destruction.?

The politicians in this world... have at their command weapons of mass destruction far more complex than their own thinking processes.

We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.

I think you have always heard, and you continue to hear from officials, a measure of high confidence that, indeed, the weapons of mass destruction will be found.

The biggest weapon of mass destruction in history is the AK-47, not Iranian nuclear weapons.

Throughout our courtship, Kenny told me that he had proof that Saddam Hussein was a threat because he possessed weapons of mass destruction. I told him, 'You had me at weapons.'

The alliance should agree... to an effective NATO role against the new threats presented by international terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.

We never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country.

Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.

China is one of the world's greatest proliferators of weapons of mass destruction to these rogue nations

The biggest threat facing America is terrorists with weapons of mass destruction.

I mean there is no capital requirements to it or anything of the sort. And basically, I said there were possibly financial weapons of mass destruction, and they had them. They destroyed AIG. They certainly contributed to the destruction of Bear Sterns and Lehman. Although Lehman had other problems, too.

We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.

The advent of interconnectedness and of weapons of mass destruction means that, increasingly, I share a destiny with my enemy.

The consequence of Mr. Bush's and Blair's historic lie that the reason for invading Iraq was weapons of mass destruction, is that everything is being doubted.

We achieved a deal with the Russians that didn't wind up in two days of strikes that would have sent a, quote, "message," but would not have removed the weapons. We struck a deal to get all of the declared weapons out of Syria. Never before in a conflict has that ever happened, that during the conflict weapons of mass destruction are taken out of the zone of conflict. And thank God we did that, because if we hadn't done that, today ISIL would have those chemical weapons in large parts of the country.

I am confident that we will find evidence that makes it clear he had weapons of mass destruction.

In our view, derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction carrying dangers that, while latent, are potentially lethal.

Before people crow about the absence of weapons of mass destruction, I suggest they wait a bit.

Obviously the administration intends to publicize all the weapons of mass destruction U.S. forces find - and there will be plenty.

The strength of the United States is not the gold at Fort Knox or the weapons of mass destruction that we have, but the sum total of the education and the character of our people.

Any country on the face of the Earth with an active intelligence program knows that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.

I believe the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction presents the greatest threat that the world has ever known. We are finding more and more countries who are acquiring technology - not only missile technology - and are developing chemical weapons and biological weapons capabilities to be used in theater and also on a long range basis. So I think that is perhaps the greatest threat that any of us will face in the coming years.

The judgements about the severity of the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of a mass destruction - WMD - were presented with a certainty that was not justified.

World peace is threatened not only by weapons of mass destruction but also by conventional weapons which have led to countless violations of human rights, including the rights to life and to physical integrity. A strong treaty can contribute greatly to international and regional peace, security and stability.

Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.

George Bush sold us on going to war with Iraq based on the threat of weapons of mass destruction. But we still haven't found them.

So has the strategic decision been made to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the leadership in Baghdad? I think our judgment has to be clearly not.

The possibility that terrorist groups could obtain weapons of mass destruction should not be dismissed as a fiction. This is a horrific threat the international community should take seriously. As long as these weapons exist, so, too, does the risk of their use - by accident or design.

Obviously some states are allowed to have weapons of mass destruction while others are not.

Saddam's removal is necessary to eradicate the threat from his weapons of mass destruction

He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.

Imagine, a September 11 with weapons of mass destruction. It's not 3,000. It's tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children.

The events of September 11 were carried out by people armed not with weapons of mass destruction, but with blades you can buy at a newsagent

There were no weapons of mass destruction and Saddam Hussein was not involved in the September 11th attack.

We know where they are [Iraq's weapons of mass destruction]. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.

Tony Blair took us to war in Iraq on the basis of the supposed threat of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

There are people who in large measure have information that we need . . . so that we can track down the weapons of mass destruction in that country.

North Korea is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while starving its citizens.

Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction.

I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction.

Iran is actively pursuing the development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles.

Number one, that it is smart to communicate and negotiate with your enemy instead of just waging war with bombs and weapons of mass destruction.

Not acting to rid the world of weapons of mass destruction is neither politically nor morally acceptable.

I grew up in Los Alamos, New Mexico, which is my hometown. In Los Alamos is, for people who don't know, a nuclear lab that built the atomic bomb. The only reason the town exists is to make nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction, and that's still happening there.