Top 157 Wikileaks Quotes & Sayings

WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions.

I don't see anything that's come out on WikiLeaks that was a legitimate secret.

The John Podesta WikiLeaks dump came just about one hour after the "Access Hollywood" tape was published. The "I like to grab them by the p-word" tape, one hour after that came out is when WikiLeaks dropped the first tranche of John Podesta e-mails hacked by the Russians.

The fallout from Wikileaks is incomparable to 9/11, the U.S.S. Cole, numerous embassies, et al.

WikiLeaks is designed to make capitalism more free and ethical.

Amazon webhosting dropped Wikileaks as a customer after receiving a complaint from U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman, despite the fact that Wikileaks had not been charged, let alone convicted, of any crime.

WikiLeaks combines several of my prior interests in technology, policy questions, and journalism.

Wikileaks is providing information on what ambassadors are sending to Washington and things like that. Maybe some of that has a right to some kind of secrecy, but there is a heavy burden and I think its pretty hard to meet. I haven't read everything from Wikileaks by any means but the parts that I have read and seen I think are things the public should know.

But on the contrary Wikileaks is under heavy attack by the government and corporations are participating in that by closing down their websites.

WikiLeaks is a service to the population. Assange should get an award for - presidential medal of honor.

WikiLeaks is literally the worst place in the world to try and plant a false story.

There is also evidence that the people close - that people close to the [Donald] Trump campaign had advanced notice of WikiLeaks actions and may have had direct contact with WikiLeaks itself while they were releasing those documents from the Democratic Party, from the [Hillary] Clinton campaign.

Saving Edward Snowden from prison is one of WikiLeaks' achievements of which I am most proud.

Most of what is done I think is to kept secret so the public won't know. The same is true of what Wikileaks exposed.

Wikileaks didn't help confidence with American administrations because of conversations made public so easily.

WikiLeaks' disclosures should be protected under the First Amendment.

The most rebelliousness I see now is coming out of WikiLeaks and D.C. Leaks and BlackListed News.

WikiLeaks is what happens when the entire U.S. government is forced to go through a full-body scanner.

Has WikiLeaks been forced to do one thing rather than another in response to resource constraints? Yes. Constantly.

WikiLeaks does not publish from the jurisdiction of Ecuador, from this embassy or in the territory of Ecuador; we publish from France, we publish from, from Germany, we publish from The Netherlands and from a number of other countries, so that the attempted squeeze on WikiLeaks is through my refugee status; and this is, this is really intolerable. [It means] that [they] are trying to get at a publishing organisation; [they] try and prevent it from publishing true information that is of intense interest to the American people and others about an election.

WikiLeaks presents a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States.

Wikileaks is a democratizing force. Its giving individuals access to decisions and thinking by their representatives and in a democracy that ought to be reflexive.

People love WikiLeaks when it is exposing corruption in their opponents. People oppose WikiLeaks when it is exposing corruption or dangerous behavior in themselves.

Why do we even need WikiLeaks? They're not the only organization that publishes leaks. And they don't have some special technology that allows them to post on the Internet with mirrored sites. The idea of WikiLeaks lives on, but as an organization, it's become increasingly irrelevant.

I also urge the Obama administration - both on its own and in cooperation with other responsible governments around the world - to use all legal means necessary to shut down WikiLeaks before it can do more damage by releasing additional cables. WikiLeaks' activities represent a shared threat to collective international security.

I thought it was a classic David and Goliath story, and I was fully onboard Team WikiLeaks. I was very pro the leaks, barring the redaction issue. But I see WikiLeaks as a publisher.

I don't think we can dignify documents dumped by Wikileaks and just assume that they're all accurate and true.

WikiLeaks is a important focus of our attention.

What Wikileaks exposed is kind of superficial in a way.

This WikiLeaks document dump is showing - it's demonstrating, it is illustrating - that there is no boundary between the media and the Democrat Party, that it's one and the same.

The values of WikiLeaks have been completely overshadowed by Julian Assange.

If there is one currency that helped Wikileaks take on the might of the U.S. Government, it was Bitcoins.

The aim of Wikileaks is to achieve just reform around the world and do it through the mechanism of transparency.

In the physical world, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is a wanted man.

I'm a freedom of information campaigner, so obviously I support the cause of Wikileaks.

What was particularly impressive by the [Donald] Trump campaign at the time is how they were so organized around the WikiLeaks stuff.

The first serious infowar is now engaged. The field of battle is WikiLeaks. You are the troops.

In the history of Wikileaks, nobody has claimed that the material being put out is not authentic.

It seems like WikiLeaks has better information on Hillary Clinton than she does herself.

If I had some information, the last thing I would ever do with it is send it to Wikileaks.

The [Donald] Trump campaign turned on a dime instantly as soon as those WikiLeaks dumps started.

WikiLeaks published the Afghan War Logs and U.S. diplomatic cables stolen from a classified network by an Army private.

The owner of Wikileaks has gone mad or he has joined hands with our opposition parties to malign my government.

WikiLeaks is a lot of things. This past year, WikiLeaks was a tool of Russian intelligence and the Russian government and their interference operation against the American presidential election to benefit Donald Trump.

WikiLeaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than WikiLeaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, Russian offshore stem-cell centers, former African kleptocrats, or the Pentagon.

What's really important about WikiLeaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans. They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions. Then they have given that information to WikiLeaks for the purpose of putting it on the Internet.

Let's face it: WikiLeaks exists because the mainstream media haven't done their job.

A lot of people who work for WikiLeaks have the same instinct as me: If you are pushed you push back.

WikiLeaks is irritating and annoying for Germany, but not a threat. From an international perspective, I see their actions as totally irresponsible.

WikiLeaks is the 9/11 of diplomacy.

WikiLeaks is what happens when the entire US government is forced to go through a full-body scanner.

The difficulty that WikiLeaks has, of course, is that we can't go around speculating on who our sources are. That would be irresponsible.

My links to WikiLeaks and Edward Snowden mean I am treated as a threat and can't return to the U.K.

There are many people, including me, who admire the original mission of WikiLeaks.

WikiLeaks is not a news organization; it is a cell of activists that is releasing information designed to embarrass people in power.

If we really care about safety we would close down WikiLeaks. We would treat the people at WikiLeaks as enemy combatants. We would declare that the kind of thing this private did is treason. WikiLeaks is not a fun and games event. WikiLeaks undermines profoundly the ability of the United States to work around the world. Why would you, if you were a foreigner thinking about helping the United States, why would you confide anything to an American when you know that it could end up in The New York Times based on some leak?

When Wikileaks came out... never heard of Wikileaks, never heard of it. When Wikileaks came out, all I was just saying is, "Well, look at all this information here, this is pretty good stuff." They tried to hack the Republican, the RNC, but we had good defenses. They didn't have defenses, which is pretty bad management. But we had good defenses, they tried to hack both of them. They weren't able to get through to Republicans. No, I found it very interesting when I read this stuff and I said, "Wow." It was just a figure of speech. I said, "Well, look at this. It's good reading".

WikiLeaks exposed the most dangerous lies of all, which are those that are told to us by elected governments.

Being editor of WikiLeaks was always a pretty difficult job.

If WikiLeaks were a for-profit company, determining its real value would be a nearly impossible task.