A Quote by Charles Kennedy

We all accept the world would be safer without Saddam's baleful dictatorship. — © Charles Kennedy
We all accept the world would be safer without Saddam's baleful dictatorship.
The world is safer without Saddam [Hussein]. Certainly the people of Iraq are better without Saddam.
We are safer, the region is safer, the world is safer without Saddam.
I still think the world is better off and safer without Saddam Hussein.
Those who doubted whether Iraq or the world would be better off without Saddam Hussein, and those who believe today that we are not safer with his capture, don't have the judgment to be President.
For all who love freedom and peace, the world without Saddam Hussein's regime is a better and safer place.
To sum up, there is no evidence that a world without nuclear weapons would be a dangerous world. On the contrary, it would be a safer world, as I will show later.
I think the world is safer without Iran with a nuclear weapon. The world has got the potential to be safer if we fully implement the Paris agreement.
I believe that the world is better off without Saddam Hussein. I believe it's clear that he had every intention to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction. I can only imagine what Saddam Hussein would be doing with the wealth he would acquire with oil at $110 and $120 a barrel.
The world will not accept dictatorship or domination.
The capture of Saddam has not made America safer.
Any dictatorship would be better than modern democracy. There cannot be so incompetent a dictator, that he would show more stupidity than a majority of the people. Best dictatorship would be one where lots of heads would roll and government would prevent any economical growth.
They have been talking about a dictatorship and they were right because there's a dictatorship and there's a government that has been fighting that dictatorship, the dictatorship of the media.
To be consistent with this discourse of lifting up the military dictatorship in Brazil, the dictatorship that extended from 1964 to 1985, Bolsonaro, his whole life, has been uplifting not only the dictatorship itself but also the methods that the dictatorship used to stay in power, including torture.
Iraq is better without Saddam Hussein than with Saddam Hussein. Without a doubt.
There ought to be an absolute dictatorship... a dictatorship of painters... a dictatorship of one painter... to suppress all those who have betrayed us.
An American-led overthrow of Saddam Hussein - and the replacement of the radical Baathist dictatorship with a new government more closely aligned with the United States would put America more wholly in charge of the region than any power since the Ottomans, or maybe even the Romans.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!