A Quote by Clive Lewis

Parliament must do a better job at holding the Government to account than it managed in the Article 50 debates. — © Clive Lewis
Parliament must do a better job at holding the Government to account than it managed in the Article 50 debates.
The fact is that I'm interested in getting on with my job of holding the Government to account and I think that the Government should get on with the job of effectively running the country and not making excuses for poor performance, not lowering expectations. Their job is to deliver on their election commitments.
I'm not a critic, I'm a journalist. I'm doing my job holding the government to account.
The government's intention is to function, to have debates in Parliament, and to work in the interest of the people.
If you owe $50, you're a delinquent account. If you owe $50,000, you're a small businessmen. If you owe $50 million, you're a corporation. If you owe $50 billion, you're the government.
It used to be an article of faith held across parliament that the government should be 'technology neutral' to achieve cost-effective decarbonisation.
I turned 30 and decided if I was going to try acting I had better try or wind up still holding a desk job at 50.
Everybody must be managed. Queens must be managed. Kings must be managed, for men want managing almost as much as women, and that's saying a good deal.
We can and must support our MPs in doing the job they will be elected to do: to hold the government to account in order to do what's best for Britain.
The function of parliament is to hold the executive to account. We should never overlook the primacy of parliament.
No government by experts in which the masses do not have the chance to inform the experts as to their needs can be anything but an oligarchy managed in the interest of the few. And the enlightenment must proceed in ways which force the administrative specialists to take account of the needs. The world has suffered more from leaders and authorities than from the masses. The essential need ... is the improvement of the methods and conditions of debate, discussion and persuasion. That is the problem of the public.
The public treasure has been duly applied to the uses to which it was appropriated by Parliament, and regular accounts have been annually laid before Parliament, of every article of expense.
I must say that, in the first instance, we got the request from many African countries who said, look, you people had better host the Parliament. So, the general feeling around the Continent was that it would be better that the Parliament was based here. In part, because of what this country has done with regard to establishing a democratic system, and we have responded to that. We have said, fine.
The will of the British people must now be put into effect as quickly as possible. Under Article 50 of the EU Treaty the UK must leave the European Union within two years at the latest.
Parliament's job is to conduct discussions. But many a time, Parliament is used to ignore issues, and in such situations, obstruction of Parliament is in the favour of democracy. Therefore, parliamentary obstruction is not undemocratic.
I managed to work for more than 50 years with just paper, pencils and film. My son's generation and the one coming up after can't work with just paper and pencils any more. I managed to avoid using a computer. I don't even have a cellphone. I feel lucky I managed to live like that.
In a parliamentary democracy, it is the job of parliament to decide the law, not the government.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!