A Quote by Daniel Altman

Diverse groups of countries can do a lot by trading amongst themselves, exploiting differences in costs, resources, and technologies. — © Daniel Altman
Diverse groups of countries can do a lot by trading amongst themselves, exploiting differences in costs, resources, and technologies.
Diverse groups of problem solvers outperformed the groups of the best individuals at solving complex problems. The reason: the diverse groups got stuck less often than the smart individuals, who tended to think similarly.
The main mineral in your cellphone, coltan [a black metallic ore], comes from the Eastern Congo. Multinational corporations are there exploiting the very rich mineral resources of the region. A lot of them are backing militias which are fighting one other to gain control of the resources or a piece of the resources.
There are leaders who know that however furious the debate, there are good men and women in all population groups - amongst blacks, amongst whites, and amongst Afrikaans and English speaking people.
Just as there's some technologies that jeopardize revenue for traditional products, there are also technologies that can significantly lower costs.
As I moved to less and less diverse places in my life, I realized that white people don't talk about race amongst themselves!
As I moved to less and less diverse places in my life, I realized that white people dont talk about race amongst themselves!
Young people today have lots of experience ... interacting with new technologies, but a lot less so of creating [or] expressing themselves with new technologies. It's almost as if they can read but not write.
Hackman's paradox: Groups have natural advantages: they have more resources than individuals; greater diversity of resources; more flexibility in deploying the resources; many opportunities for collective learning; and, the potential for synergy. Yet studies show that their actual performance often is subpar relative to "nominal" groups (i.e. individuals given the same task but their results are pooled.) The two most common reasons: groups are assigned work that is better done by individuals or are structured in ways that cap their full potential.
The socialist countries have the moral duty of liquidating their tacit complicity with the exploiting countries of the West.
Every race will have disagreements amongst themselves, but we must put aside our differences, and work together for the advancement of that race" Sandra Forsythe
We provide an enormous amount of resources, particularly with regard to military resources, to countries all over the world. And in many cases, those countries are not compensating the American taxpayer for the commitment that we're making to their security.
I was that gay kid in high school who didn't have a lot of close friends but circulated amongst groups of people when necessary.
We spend a lot of money on protecting other countries. And yet those other countries aren't paying nearly what it costs us for that protection. We're - they're getting one of the great bargains of all time...
It's creating things that make enough money to create resources to generate new technologies to have those technologies to generate more resources so I can make more things happen.
We know we cannot defend to be kind to animals until we stop exploiting them - exploiting animals in the name of science, exploiting animals in the name of sport, exploiting animals in the name of fashion, and yes, exploiting animals in the name of food.
I think entire social groups are formed through technologies that could never exist in the real world, and relationships that are a function of these technologies' ability to accelerate feeling and emotional contact.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!